From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>, "xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: About commit "io: change inX() to have their own IO barrier overrides"
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:29:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a22fEGdVKVVs_40Rc_vs9SQ2ikejwMtFpyR_o+74utWaA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <182a37c2-7437-b1bd-8b86-5c9ce2e29f00@huawei.com>
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:18 PM John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> wrote:
> On 06/03/2020 15:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 11:40 AM John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> wrote:
> >> On 06/03/2020 07:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:44 AM Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> -- a/lib/logic_pio.c
> >> +++ b/lib/logic_pio.c
> >> @@ -229,13 +229,21 @@ unsigned long
> >> logic_pio_trans_cpuaddr(resource_size_t addr)
> >> }
> >>
> >> #if defined(CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO) && defined(PCI_IOBASE)
> >> +
> >> +#define logic_in_to_cpu_b(x) (x)
> >> +#define logic_in_to_cpu_w(x) __le16_to_cpu(x)
> >> +#define logic_in_to_cpu_l(x) __le32_to_cpu(x)
> >> +
> >> #define BUILD_LOGIC_IO(bw, type) \
>
> Note: The "bw" argument name could be improved to "bwl", since this
> macro is used for building inl() also.
>
> >> type logic_in##bw(unsigned long addr) \
> >> { \
> >> type ret = (type)~0; \
> >> \
> >> if (addr < MMIO_UPPER_LIMIT) { \
> >> - ret = read##bw(PCI_IOBASE + addr); \
> >> + void __iomem *_addr = PCI_IOBASE + addr; \
> >> + __io_pbr(); \
> >> + ret = logic_in_to_cpu_##bw(__raw_read##bw(_addr)); \
> >> + __io_par(ret); \
> >> } else if (addr >= MMIO_UPPER_LIMIT && addr < IO_SPACE_LIMIT) {\
> >> struct logic_pio_hwaddr *entry = find_io_rang
> >>
> >> We could prob combine the le_to_cpu and __raw_read into a single macro.
> >
> > What is the purpose of splitting out the byteswap rather than leaving the
> > open-coded rather than __le16_to_cpu(__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr))?
>
> I'm just copying what is in asm-generic io.h, which uses the 16b and 32b
> byteswaps in the w and l variants, respectively.
Sure, but I don't think that needs another macro.
>
> The idea is good, but it would be nice if we just somehow use a common
> asm-generic io.h definition directly in logic_pio.c, like:
>
> asm-generic io.h:
>
> #ifndef __raw_inw // name?
> #define __raw_inw __raw_inw
> static inline u16 __raw_inw(unsigned long addr)
> {
> u16 val;
>
> __io_pbr();
> val = __le16_to_cpu(__raw_readw(addr));
> __io_par(val);
> return val;
> }
> #endif
>
> #include <linux/logic_pio.h>
>
> #ifndef inw
> #define inw __raw_inw
> #endif
Yes, makes sense. Maybe __arch_inw() then? Not great either, but I think
that's better than __raw_inw() because __raw_* would sound like it
mirrors __raw_readl() that lacks the barriers and byteswaps.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-06 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 9:52 About commit "io: change inX() to have their own IO barrier overrides" John Garry
2020-02-28 23:57 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-03-02 12:35 ` John Garry
2020-03-02 16:44 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-03-03 13:18 ` John Garry
2020-03-03 16:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-03 17:16 ` John Garry
2020-03-06 3:44 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-03-06 7:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-06 10:39 ` John Garry
2020-03-06 15:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-06 16:18 ` John Garry
2020-03-06 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-03-06 16:43 ` John Garry
2020-03-11 16:12 ` John Garry
2020-03-06 21:15 ` Sinan Kaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a22fEGdVKVVs_40Rc_vs9SQ2ikejwMtFpyR_o+74utWaA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).