linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Linux-ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:13:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCQr-Djbkf-S5aq+bvuemp1hDznVC+0zPHithgHA6tbDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208153501.1467-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:35, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> SIS_AVG_CPU was introduced as a means of avoiding a search when the
> average search cost indicated that the search would likely fail. It
> was a blunt instrument and disabled by 4c77b18cf8b7 ("sched/fair: Make
> select_idle_cpu() more aggressive") and later replaced with a proportional
> search depth by 1ad3aaf3fcd2 ("sched/core: Implement new approach to
> scale select_idle_cpu()").
>
> While there are corner cases where SIS_AVG_CPU is better, it has now been
> disabled for almost three years. As the intent of SIS_PROP is to reduce
> the time complexity of select_idle_cpu(), lets drop SIS_AVG_CPU and focus
> on SIS_PROP as a throttling mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>

Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c     | 20 +++++++++-----------
>  kernel/sched/features.h |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 98075f9ea9a8..ac7b34e7372b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6145,7 +6145,6 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>  {
>         struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
>         struct sched_domain *this_sd;
> -       u64 avg_cost, avg_idle;
>         u64 time;
>         int this = smp_processor_id();
>         int cpu, nr = INT_MAX;
> @@ -6154,18 +6153,17 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>         if (!this_sd)
>                 return -1;
>
> -       /*
> -        * Due to large variance we need a large fuzz factor; hackbench in
> -        * particularly is sensitive here.
> -        */
> -       avg_idle = this_rq()->avg_idle / 512;
> -       avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1;
> +       if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
> +               u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
>
> -       if (sched_feat(SIS_AVG_CPU) && avg_idle < avg_cost)
> -               return -1;
> +               /*
> +                * Due to large variance we need a large fuzz factor;
> +                * hackbench in particularly is sensitive here.
> +                */
> +               avg_idle = this_rq()->avg_idle / 512;
> +               avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1;
>
> -       if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
> -               u64 span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
> +               span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
>                 if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost)
>                         nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
>                 else
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
> index 68d369cba9e4..e875eabb6600 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/features.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true)
>  /*
>   * When doing wakeups, attempt to limit superfluous scans of the LLC domain.
>   */
> -SCHED_FEAT(SIS_AVG_CPU, false)
>  SCHED_FEAT(SIS_PROP, true)
>
>  /*
> --
> 2.26.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-08 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-08 15:34 [PATCH 0/4] Reduce scanning of runqueues in select_idle_sibling Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 16:13   ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2020-12-08 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 16:03   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-08 16:30     ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-09  5:28     ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-09  9:05       ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-09 11:07         ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-09 11:33           ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-10  5:18   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-10  9:32     ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Do not replace recent_used_cpu with the new target Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 16:14   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-10  9:40     ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-08 15:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Return an idle cpu if one is found after a failed search for an idle core Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 16:15   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] Reduce scanning of runqueues in select_idle_sibling Mel Gorman
2020-12-10  8:00   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-10  9:38     ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-10 11:04       ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-11  9:51         ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-11 10:23           ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-12 10:02             ` Vincent Guittot
     [not found] ` <20201211062542.3082-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-12-11  9:02   ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Do not replace recent_used_cpu with the new target Mel Gorman
     [not found]   ` <20201211093443.3259-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-12-11  9:45     ` Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-27 13:51 [PATCH v5 0/4] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-27 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2021-01-25  8:59 [PATCH v4 0/4] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-25  8:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2020-12-07  9:15 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Reduce worst-case scanning of runqueues in select_idle_sibling Mel Gorman
2020-12-07  9:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2020-12-07 15:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-08 10:07   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-12-08 10:59     ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 13:24       ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-08 13:36         ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 13:43           ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-08 13:53             ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 14:47               ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-08 15:12                 ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-08 15:19                   ` Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKfTPtCQr-Djbkf-S5aq+bvuemp1hDznVC+0zPHithgHA6tbDg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).