From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F95FC43382 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D589721547 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="rF1J1Jn0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D589721547 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726957AbeI0BoB (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:44:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:37299 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726544AbeI0BoA (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:44:00 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x26-v6so78362pfn.4 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:29:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Fy9a0xmtIONzRUF59arYr7m9+Szk2YA+k3QOO2pqiJI=; b=rF1J1Jn0GfxtHjC+roQ170Svlo7PKSoQhgX9jt2fWakyAh82T6YBpl/kN3rfixVSZa MLYtvrli+LPV0ypgBbZHwQenne8bpiy+7eqqUMeX9AjrobcIQTBuaCg7N/AxkQdCB2Ol Pi/MrlrXGhHaePViu5Lo5sV/ktb/Cz5DDNJeW2jcGlYJLqZZBrHieDVqHIx6MrzCXUd4 nhvWkKnR3qYkxXk+/Eo6PqtQsx9DqXgtj8XvIkiDkOpkDKCRXivMoIiKNWlx5bUSLJ7x H408YNcIxxVCu/4YCda90aICGlvMT33Bu2+MuRhQAZ6E8wH2U4+3WqIbmNWCQj2EIR5g 4laQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Fy9a0xmtIONzRUF59arYr7m9+Szk2YA+k3QOO2pqiJI=; b=stVrgaHcvUjIkpJfBXy7WpK3xr8wkgEms+py/+WZ+qyjRDcFeYMCTVgkfTBsMVSMst 3vImk4ybEjV5sAb6I4mZKuQaDEf6LB9f83rtqxMxXomIOUx7/BZjFv+9Qotl/SvsdWB5 vPeb3LS8t6fDWGj9K5y63VcNRUWfHCtmAPA0AfmGzRAd/ip8KglpttS/ZQiNJe+yc3lG JnbXRJwYCtC2mOyFpL7pGwP8p1iMui5t/X2RZr0AggUaJH01b17lwQ0j9OMrq5moIKhd DaJ5j2N9Sc5yCbYffatKTjTWhFXbvpV2oCpEEAomNX9y9HQhaTcsjU4u5MXuK9g01bVF xELQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojH14Xe3tKIKmZ7/ZoZP7Ggyy8GgY9A3Edv+o2boYSlS9Gpnd3M /VzI3THxzIZgCfAcY7z9mt30TjA/cBUEW73kcPiMtw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63FkogNVKddmbNvd3FRZq00MrTG6sDghAjSg1hHHAhf2li436mm2cU21EVkDQ8A8tlBBiVZAMiAPX8+bIlhImU= X-Received: by 2002:a63:f347:: with SMTP id t7-v6mr2445529pgj.255.1537990171349; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <84cf6ae0-97c8-6b73-ca86-b3d3b3daba5b@pobox.com> <8d5cf8c6-556a-96a1-610d-c92355783a9f@pobox.com> <20180926180019.GD22824@google.com> <20180926184259.GB14797@kroah.com> <20180926190303.GA18293@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20180926190303.GA18293@kroah.com> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:29:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] compiler.h: give up __compiletime_assert_fallback() To: Kees Cook , Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Linus Torvalds , Masahiro Yamada , sparse@chrisli.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, LKML , daniel.santos@pobox.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, jani.nikula@intel.com, Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:45:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > > I'm not digging up a compiler.h patch from a web site and adding it to > > > the tree this late in the release cycle. Especially given that it > > > hasn't had any testing anywhere... > > > > Good point about it not living in -next. > > > > Who should be carrying these sorts of patches? In the past it's been > > Andrew or Masahiro, yes? For linux-next, maybe it can go via -mm? > > Either is fine with me, as long as it isn't one of my trees :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h Besides, I think we want the v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/25/103 -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers