linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Reber <adrian@lisas.de>, Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fork: add clone6
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 07:15:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrU0wXuefHFzRNrQjQ+xgTz6tbPa-sLcBV=dV58QEcA6HQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190528100802.sdfqtwrowrmulpml@brauner.io>

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:08 AM Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:27:08PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:42 AM Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hm, still pondering whether having one unsigned int argument passed
> > > through registers that captures all the flags from the old clone() would
> > > be a good idea.
> >
> > That sounds like a reasonable thing to do.
> >
> > Maybe we could continue to call the old flags CLONE_XYZ and continue
> > to pass them in as "flags" argument, and then we have CLONE_EXT_XYZ
> > flags for a new 64-bit flag field that comes in through memory in the
> > new clone_args thing?
>
> Hm. I think I'll try a first version without an additional register
> flags argument. And here's why: I'm not sure it buys us a lot especially
> if we're giving up on making this convenient for seccomp anyway.
> And with that out of the way (at least for the moment) I would really
> like to make this interface consistent. But we can revisit this when I
> have the code.
>

Seems reasonable.  Once the interface is nailed down, we can see if it
makes sense to break out some flags into a register.  I would guess
that all the unsharing flags are a good candidate.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-26 10:26 [PATCH 1/2] fork: add clone6 Christian Brauner
2019-05-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] arch: wire-up clone6() syscall on x86 Christian Brauner
2019-05-27 10:02   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-27 10:45     ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-27 12:28       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-27 12:34         ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-27 18:48           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-26 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] fork: add clone6 Linus Torvalds
2019-05-27 10:42   ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-27 19:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-27 19:36       ` Jann Horn
2019-05-30 18:26         ` Kees Cook
2019-05-28 10:08       ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-28 14:15         ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2019-05-28 15:23 ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALCETrU0wXuefHFzRNrQjQ+xgTz6tbPa-sLcBV=dV58QEcA6HQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian@lisas.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=avagin@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).