linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86/ia32: Fix ia32_restore_sigcontext AC leak
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:49:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrU7nW8JVbu79VppNhn2RSxvSiqanXgOkwboUqbJYnQyTQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190225163745.GF32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:37 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 08:29:12AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> > > index 321fe5f5d0e9..e04eeeddcc35 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> > > @@ -53,17 +53,16 @@
> > > #define GET_SEG(seg)        ({            \
> > >    unsigned short tmp;                \
> > >    get_user_ex(tmp, &sc->seg);            \
> > > -    tmp;                        \
> > > +    tmp | 3;                    \
> > > })
> > >
> >
> > Drop this part.
> >
> > > #define COPY_SEG_CPL3(seg)    do {            \
> > > -    regs->seg = GET_SEG(seg) | 3;            \
> > > +    regs->seg = GET_SEG(seg);            \
> > > } while (0)
> >
> > And this.
> >
> > Unfortunately, whether we want the | 3 varies by segment. For FS and
> > GS, we definitely don’t want it, since 0 is a common and important
> > value, and 3 is a deeply screwed up value.  (3 is legal to *write* to
> > GS, and it sticks, but IRET silently changes it to 0, because the
> > original 386 designers (I assume) confused themselves.
>
> > >
> > > #define RELOAD_SEG(seg)        {        \
> > > -    unsigned int pre = GET_SEG(seg);    \
> > > +    unsigned int pre = (seg);        \
> > >    unsigned int cur = get_user_seg(seg);    \
> > > -    pre |= 3;                \
>
> And here ?
>
> > >    if (pre != cur)                \
> > >        set_user_seg(seg, pre);        \
> > > }
>
> Thing is; afaict the current code _always_ does |3 on any GET_SET()
> result.
>
> If you want to change that; I'm fine with that, but lets not do that in
> this same patch.

Ugh, you're right.  I bet I can come up with some awful case involving
ptrace and sigreturn where this causes problems.

I have a patch series I need to dust off that deletes this entire
file.  It's this and its parents:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=execve&id=0618fe90d8224979f70b15d33dcae75a403592e5

>
> So then?
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> index 321fe5f5d0e9..4d5fcd47ab75 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> @@ -61,9 +61,8 @@
>  } while (0)
>
>  #define RELOAD_SEG(seg)                {               \
> -       unsigned int pre = GET_SEG(seg);        \
> +       unsigned int pre = (seg) | 3;           \
>         unsigned int cur = get_user_seg(seg);   \
> -       pre |= 3;                               \
>         if (pre != cur)                         \
>                 set_user_seg(seg, pre);         \
>  }
> @@ -72,6 +71,7 @@ static int ia32_restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs,
>                                    struct sigcontext_32 __user *sc)
>  {
>         unsigned int tmpflags, err = 0;
> +       u16 gs, fs, es, ds;
>         void __user *buf;
>         u32 tmp;
>
> @@ -79,16 +79,10 @@ static int ia32_restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs,
>         current->restart_block.fn = do_no_restart_syscall;
>
>         get_user_try {
> -               /*
> -                * Reload fs and gs if they have changed in the signal
> -                * handler.  This does not handle long fs/gs base changes in
> -                * the handler, but does not clobber them at least in the
> -                * normal case.
> -                */
> -               RELOAD_SEG(gs);
> -               RELOAD_SEG(fs);
> -               RELOAD_SEG(ds);
> -               RELOAD_SEG(es);
> +               gs = GET_SEG(gs);
> +               fs = GET_SEG(fs);
> +               ds = GET_SEG(ds);
> +               es = GET_SEG(es);
>
>                 COPY(di); COPY(si); COPY(bp); COPY(sp); COPY(bx);
>                 COPY(dx); COPY(cx); COPY(ip); COPY(ax);
> @@ -106,6 +100,17 @@ static int ia32_restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs,
>                 buf = compat_ptr(tmp);
>         } get_user_catch(err);
>
> +       /*
> +        * Reload fs and gs if they have changed in the signal
> +        * handler.  This does not handle long fs/gs base changes in
> +        * the handler, but does not clobber them at least in the
> +        * normal case.
> +        */
> +       RELOAD_SEG(gs);
> +       RELOAD_SEG(fs);
> +       RELOAD_SEG(ds);
> +       RELOAD_SEG(es);
> +
>         err |= fpu__restore_sig(buf, 1);
>
>         force_iret();

Looks good to me.  The order of the restores shouldn't matter at all.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-25 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-25 12:43 [PATCH 0/6] objtool: UACCESS validation Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/uaccess: Dont evaluate argument inside AC region Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 15:43   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 16:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:36     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-25 16:50       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 19:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-25 19:18       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-25 18:10   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 19:46   ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/ia32: Fix ia32_restore_sigcontext AC leak Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 15:41   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 16:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:29       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 16:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:49           ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] objtool: Set insn->func for alternatives Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] objtool: Replace STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD annotation Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:11   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-02-25 16:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 16:23       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-02-27 12:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-28  0:30       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] objtool: Add UACCESS validation Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 15:53   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-25 16:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 17:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 17:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-25 17:38         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-02-27 14:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 14:17     ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-02-27 14:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 14:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 15:40           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-27 17:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-28  9:40               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-28  9:59                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-28 10:05                   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-28 10:52                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 16:18     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-27 17:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 17:36         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-25 12:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] objtool: Add Direction Flag validation Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrU7nW8JVbu79VppNhn2RSxvSiqanXgOkwboUqbJYnQyTQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).