From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964814AbcDYTcO (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:32:14 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:35637 "EHLO mail-oi0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933424AbcDYTcM (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:32:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1461605698-12385-2-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> References: <1461605698-12385-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <1461605698-12385-2-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:31:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: add SGX definition to cpufeature To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Greg KH , Kai Huang , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Boris Ostrovsky , Huang Rui , Mathias Krause , Wan Zongshun , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > From: Kai Huang Should this come with a nosgx boot option and an IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL check to disable the feature if BIOS doesn't support it? --Andy