From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf pmu: Improve CPU core PMU HW event list ordering
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:31:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgqJzQJ7GfL6Q3VgARd1=rrkRYqOqSivZww-LOo+DvKFA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592384514-119954-3-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:06 PM John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> For perf list, the CPU core PMU HW event ordering is such that not all
> events may will be listed adjacent - consider this example:
>
> $ tools/perf/perf list
>
> List of pre-defined events (to be used in -e):
>
> duration_time [Tool event]
>
> branch-instructions OR cpu/branch-instructions/ [Kernel PMU event]
> branch-misses OR cpu/branch-misses/ [Kernel PMU event]
> bus-cycles OR cpu/bus-cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cache-misses OR cpu/cache-misses/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cache-references OR cpu/cache-references/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cpu-cycles OR cpu/cpu-cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_core/c3-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_core/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_core/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_pkg/c3-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_pkg/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_pkg/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cycles-ct OR cpu/cycles-ct/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cycles-t OR cpu/cycles-t/ [Kernel PMU event]
> el-abort OR cpu/el-abort/ [Kernel PMU event]
> el-capacity OR cpu/el-capacity/ [Kernel PMU event]
>
> Notice in the above example how the cstate_core PMU events are mixed in
> the middle of the CPU core events.
>
> For my arm64 platform, all the uncore events get mixed in, making the list
> very disorganised:
> page-faults OR faults [Software event]
> task-clock [Software event]
> duration_time [Tool event]
> L1-dcache-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
> L1-dcache-loads [Hardware cache event]
> L1-icache-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
> L1-icache-loads [Hardware cache event]
> branch-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
> branch-loads [Hardware cache event]
> dTLB-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
> dTLB-loads [Hardware cache event]
> iTLB-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
> iTLB-loads [Hardware cache event]
> br_mis_pred OR armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred/ [Kernel PMU event]
> br_mis_pred_retired OR armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred_retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
> br_pred OR armv8_pmuv3_0/br_pred/ [Kernel PMU event]
> br_retired OR armv8_pmuv3_0/br_retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
> br_return_retired OR armv8_pmuv3_0/br_return_retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
> bus_access OR armv8_pmuv3_0/bus_access/ [Kernel PMU event]
> bus_cycles OR armv8_pmuv3_0/bus_cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cid_write_retired OR armv8_pmuv3_0/cid_write_retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cpu_cycles OR armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> dtlb_walk OR armv8_pmuv3_0/dtlb_walk/ [Kernel PMU event]
> exc_return OR armv8_pmuv3_0/exc_return/ [Kernel PMU event]
> exc_taken OR armv8_pmuv3_0/exc_taken/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl1_ddrc0/act_cmd/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl1_ddrc0/flux_rcmd/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl1_ddrc0/flux_rd/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl1_ddrc0/flux_wcmd/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl1_ddrc0/flux_wr/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl1_ddrc0/pre_cmd/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl1_ddrc0/rnk_chg/ [Kernel PMU event]
>
> ...
>
> hisi_sccl7_l3c21/wr_hit_cpipe/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl7_l3c21/wr_hit_spipe/ [Kernel PMU event]
> hisi_sccl7_l3c21/wr_spipe/ [Kernel PMU event]
> inst_retired OR armv8_pmuv3_0/inst_retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
> inst_spec OR armv8_pmuv3_0/inst_spec/ [Kernel PMU event]
> itlb_walk OR armv8_pmuv3_0/itlb_walk/ [Kernel PMU event]
> l1d_cache OR armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_cache/ [Kernel PMU event]
> l1d_cache_refill OR armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_cache_refill/ [Kernel PMU event]
> l1d_cache_wb OR armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_cache_wb/ [Kernel PMU event]
> l1d_tlb OR armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_tlb/ [Kernel PMU event]
> l1d_tlb_refill OR armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_tlb_refill/ [Kernel PMU event]
>
> So the events are list alphabetically. However, CPU core event listing is
> special from commit dc098b35b56f ("perf list: List kernel supplied event
> aliases"), in that the alias and full event is shown (in that order).
> As such, the core events may become sparse.
>
> Improve this by grouping the CPU core events and ensure that they are
> listed first for kernel PMU events. For the first example, above, this
> now looks like:
>
> duration_time [Tool event]
> branch-instructions OR cpu/branch-instructions/ [Kernel PMU event]
> branch-misses OR cpu/branch-misses/ [Kernel PMU event]
> bus-cycles OR cpu/bus-cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cache-misses OR cpu/cache-misses/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cache-references OR cpu/cache-references/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cpu-cycles OR cpu/cpu-cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cycles-ct OR cpu/cycles-ct/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cycles-t OR cpu/cycles-t/ [Kernel PMU event]
> el-abort OR cpu/el-abort/ [Kernel PMU event]
> el-capacity OR cpu/el-capacity/ [Kernel PMU event]
> el-commit OR cpu/el-commit/ [Kernel PMU event]
> el-conflict OR cpu/el-conflict/ [Kernel PMU event]
> el-start OR cpu/el-start/ [Kernel PMU event]
> instructions OR cpu/instructions/ [Kernel PMU event]
> mem-loads OR cpu/mem-loads/ [Kernel PMU event]
> mem-stores OR cpu/mem-stores/ [Kernel PMU event]
> ref-cycles OR cpu/ref-cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> topdown-fetch-bubbles OR cpu/topdown-fetch-bubbles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> topdown-recovery-bubbles OR cpu/topdown-recovery-bubbles/ [Kernel PMU event]
> topdown-slots-issued OR cpu/topdown-slots-issued/ [Kernel PMU event]
> topdown-slots-retired OR cpu/topdown-slots-retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
> topdown-total-slots OR cpu/topdown-total-slots/ [Kernel PMU event]
> tx-abort OR cpu/tx-abort/ [Kernel PMU event]
> tx-capacity OR cpu/tx-capacity/ [Kernel PMU event]
> tx-commit OR cpu/tx-commit/ [Kernel PMU event]
> tx-conflict OR cpu/tx-conflict/ [Kernel PMU event]
> tx-start OR cpu/tx-start/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_core/c3-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_core/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_core/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_pkg/c3-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_pkg/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
> cstate_pkg/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks
Namhyung
> ---
> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> index a375364537cd..faa3e0619740 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> @@ -1400,6 +1400,7 @@ struct sevent {
> char *pmu;
> char *metric_expr;
> char *metric_name;
> + int is_cpu;
> };
>
> static int cmp_sevent(const void *a, const void *b)
> @@ -1416,6 +1417,11 @@ static int cmp_sevent(const void *a, const void *b)
> if (n)
> return n;
> }
> +
> + /* Order CPU core events to be first */
> + if (as->is_cpu != bs->is_cpu)
> + return bs->is_cpu - as->is_cpu;
> +
> return strcmp(as->name, bs->name);
> }
>
> @@ -1507,6 +1513,7 @@ void print_pmu_events(const char *event_glob, bool name_only, bool quiet_flag,
> aliases[j].pmu = pmu->name;
> aliases[j].metric_expr = alias->metric_expr;
> aliases[j].metric_name = alias->metric_name;
> + aliases[j].is_cpu = is_cpu;
> j++;
> }
> if (pmu->selectable &&
> --
> 2.26.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 9:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] perf: Improve list for arm64 John Garry
2020-06-17 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf pmu: List kernel supplied event aliases " John Garry
2020-06-17 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf pmu: Improve CPU core PMU HW event list ordering John Garry
2020-06-17 11:31 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2020-06-17 12:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-08-03 8:00 ` John Garry
2020-08-03 12:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-08-03 13:23 ` John Garry
2020-06-17 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] perf: Improve list for arm64 Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM9d7cgqJzQJ7GfL6Q3VgARd1=rrkRYqOqSivZww-LOo+DvKFA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).