Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] usb: gadget: Use correct APIs and data types for UUID handling

["Jó Ágila Bitsch" <jgilab@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:01 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:31:36PM +0100, Jó Ágila Bitsch wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:34 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > We have two types for UUIDs depending on the byte ordering.
> > > Instead of explaining how bytes should go over the wire,
> > > use dedicated APIs and data types. This removes a confusion
> > > over the byte ordering.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out. I was unaware of the exact UUID
> > functions, as I'm still quite a newbie here.
> >
> > I compiled and tested your patch in my test setup and it works perfectly.
>
> Thanks for the testing. According to Submitting Patches documentation
> you can provide a formal Tested-by tag.

Thanks for pointing this out to me.

I'm not really sure how to do that though.
On https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight,
it says:
> Both Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags, once received on mailing list from tester or reviewer, should be added by author to the applicable patches when sending next versions.

So I guess you could do that at your convenience on any next version.
Or is it already ok, if I just add the following line in my comment?

Tested-By: Jó Ágila Bitsch <jgilab@gmail.com>

I'm still quite a newbie in the kernel development community, so
thanks for bearing with my ignorance :-)

Best regards and thanks a lot,
Jó


>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>