From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47267C433FE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274FF61216 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241814AbhIWOq4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:46:56 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com ([209.85.217.44]:37799 "EHLO mail-vs1-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241707AbhIWOqz (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:46:55 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id q66so6801360vsa.4 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:45:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S3ucXHKaz0Rc++ad0uZxKyS05SChsJUfx3Hh2lMYmn4=; b=umQzOokeGEfMXSWNdCzm1nhOxpTZW6FcZBLOkwjCo8Ge1Fb9MlrR99/dYo4RLk6Ruy Z6c+9rpjTc3d/yP4s9cbeIIenUigkqPUfvRZ95rxNWFX214xP134WCWyNBBKll6GHl1U owlu1gzSBumVI6KgiswFVRHpkxFrIOq4JazmwbtlLy5iyfPSBQ09SbCOlSLTz9DYO2zi DnpiYM+RLxWbz63af4C4jh6V+bXMY2HeM9ODusGFZyQy/AMWBOWu5sGJc2rVt4eKP22I 33EoIIyLSiu9imttmPRMdVelnLc3Q5GRfcGaKueQdbzdavqo2pt8quell/cHPCGhsvuG G5vw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532SwZ6yZ7xjyTda+S1FDD7xmoDb2X0g4DRaEtmZNET1WTUP/UJv yVzuLsAa8g5TQfsiVUcH6jj6G3kCbVq71tq9GbT7EVYV X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycyPw0Z3wCTyupvlm6Je/yzgM2E9MAnxgje5sO6MKGsuy6PcrBBUp++1JNy3xgQ3TM3ZgYoOoHsUOwOzHhxhg= X-Received: by 2002:a67:cc1c:: with SMTP id q28mr4390391vsl.37.1632408318973; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:45:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:45:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes To: Al Viro Cc: linux-m68k , Greg Ungerer , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 7:18 PM Al Viro wrote: > Back in 2012 or so I'd found a bunch of fun issues with multiple > pending signals on a lot of architectures. m68k looked scarier than > usual (due to the combination of variable-sized exception frames with the > way kernel stack pointer is handled by the hardware), but I'd convinced > myself that it had been correct. > > Unfortunately, I was wrong - handling of multiple pending signals > does *not* work correctly there. [...] Thank you, queuing in the m68k branch as fixes. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds