From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] compiler-attributes for v5.3-rc8
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 21:40:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mXLbaefVBqZzz1vSREi0=HiBUgR1KU3iRjOCum7rvfrw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wi2VOPoweqnDhxXKJ9fcLQzkV1oEDjteV=z-C7KXrpomg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:20 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Macro stringification isn't entirely obvious, and an unquoted string
> could become corrupted if the stringification ends up not happening
> immediately.
Nick, Linus: shouldn't we just simply go for no stringifying at all,
i.e. changing it to:
#define __section(S) __attribute__((__section__(S)))
That way we can handle both easy things like:
__section("foo")
as well as the mentioned:
__section(".initcall" level ".init")
that we couldn't do before.
Both GCC and Clang give the same result and it is also easier to
reason about it.
Cheers,
Miguel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-05 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 18:18 [GIT PULL] compiler-attributes for v5.3-rc8 Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-05 6:23 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-05 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-05 17:18 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-05 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-05 19:53 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-05 19:40 ` Miguel Ojeda [this message]
2019-09-05 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-06 20:11 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-06 22:47 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-06 23:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-07 0:06 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-07 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-07 0:45 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-07 0:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-07 7:52 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-09-07 11:59 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-10 8:58 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-09-10 9:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-08 13:19 Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-08 13:24 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-08 17:25 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANiq72mXLbaefVBqZzz1vSREi0=HiBUgR1KU3iRjOCum7rvfrw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).