From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263464AbTD0Hkl (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 03:40:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263490AbTD0Hkl (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 03:40:41 -0400 Received: from [212.209.10.216] ([212.209.10.216]:17099 "EHLO krynn.se.axis.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263464AbTD0Hkj (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 03:40:39 -0400 Message-ID: From: Peter Kjellerstedt To: "'rmoser'" , Larry McVoy Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: statistics for this mailinglist Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 09:47:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: rmoser [mailto:mlmoser@comcast.net] > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 05:10 > To: Larry McVoy > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: statistics for this mailinglist > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 4/26/2003 at 7:24 PM Larry McVoy wrote: > > >On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 04:01:01AM +0200, root@vanheusden.com wrote: > >> Overall statistics > >> ------------------ > >> Statistics created on: Sat Apr 26 04:02:13 2003 > >> > >> First message was written at: 2003/04/19 14:58:23 > >> Last message was written at: 2003/04/20 22:58:49 > >> Total number of messages: 1783 > > > >Err, I dunno how to read these stats but I am pretty sure > >that we did not see 1783 messages in 32 hours which is what > >the numbers above imply. > > Yes we did. Good high quality ones too like this one: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105138636218351&w=2 > > (point made ;-) > >-- > >--- > >Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com > >http://www.bitmover.com/lm When looking further down the statistics mail one finds this table: > Messages per day-of-the-month > ---------------------------------------------------------- > 1 0 > 2 0 > 3 0 > 4 0 > 5 0 > 6 0 > 7 0 > 8 0 > 9 0 > 10 0 > 11 0 > 12 0 > 13 0 > 14 0 > 15 0 > 16 0 > 17 0 > 18 0 > 19 16 *** > 20 132 ****************** > 21 240 ******************************** > 22 278 ************************************* > 23 325 ******************************************** > 24 361 ************************************************* > 25 210 **************************** > 26 6 * > 27 0 > 28 0 > 29 0 > 30 0 > 31 0 It implies that the statistics were for April 19 to April 25 rather than April 19 to April 20... However, that table too seems a bit odd, as I am used to getting about the same number of mails per day, any day of the week (and there are definitely no days when I get as few as 6 or 16 mails from this list).... //Peter