linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:33:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB7PR10MB2348398516E5744F4CF8C18BFE560@DB7PR10MB2348.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190402095115.GW3430@piout.net>

Hi,

> > >  drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c
> > > index 1b792bcea3c7..53e690b0f3a2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c
> > > @@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ static int da9063_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	da9063_data_to_tm(data, &rtc->alarm_time, rtc);
> > >  	rtc->rtc_sync = false;
> > >
> > > +	if (config->rtc_data_start != RTC_SEC)
> > > +		rtc->rtc_dev->uie_unsupported = 1;
> > > +
> >
> > I think we should have a comment here, like:
> > /* FIXME: Make use of the TICK interrupt once the RTC core supports it */

Is this TICK interrupt suggestion to use the DA9063 TICK interrupt to simulate
a second granularity in the AD alarm?

If I remember correctly, the original DA9063 patch set which was for AD silicon
only, and which was sent to LKML before I took over looking at DA9063, used the
DA9063 1-second TICK interrupt to count-down the seconds from the nearest
minute in order to simulate second resolution on the RTC alarm for AD.

... yes. Here it is. The original patch was from Krystian Garbaciak and tried to
support RTC alarms on the AD silicon to a second resolution by counting down
the DA9063 TICK interrupt:

https://marc.info/?l=lm-sensors&m=134613501230005&w=2

However, I dropped that patch completely and wrote a new RTC device driver
because it didn't work in my tests.

The problem was: the TICK interrupt was indistinguishable from the ALARM
interrupt for a wake event and when I tested AD silicon to wake up an Android
device from suspend or power-off using the RTC IRQ, the device woke up on the
ALARM minute (0 seconds), discovered it was not the correct time and immediately
went back to sleep. Then it woke-up and returned back to sleep every TICK IRQ
second until the correct alarm time was reached (up to 59 times!). At which point
it woke up properly.

Regards,
Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-02 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-21 10:15 [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range Alexandre Belloni
2019-03-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: da9063: switch to rtc_time64_to_tm/rtc_tm_to_time64 Alexandre Belloni
2019-03-22 15:28   ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-01  8:43   ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 12:42     ` Steve Twiss
2019-03-22 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range Steve Twiss
2019-04-01  8:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01  8:59   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-04-01 12:39     ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-01 12:42       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-04-01 13:00         ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-01 13:21         ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 13:39           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-04-01 15:07             ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 15:16               ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-01 15:52                 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 18:53                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-01 19:34                     ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-02  8:53                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-02  9:33                         ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-02  9:51                           ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-02 10:33                             ` Steve Twiss [this message]
2019-04-02 10:42                               ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-02 11:14                                 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-02 11:52                                   ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-02  9:37                         ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-02 10:30                           ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DB7PR10MB2348398516E5744F4CF8C18BFE560@DB7PR10MB2348.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=Support.Opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).