From: "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>
To: "Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@intel.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: "mdf@kernel.org" <mdf@kernel.org>,
"linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"bhu@redhat.com" <bhu@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] fpga: dfl: pci: reduce the scope of variable 'ret'
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:05:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB381919B83DB49F937E3EDEEA85D90@DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200417015605.GA30618@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:56 AM
> To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wu, Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>; mdf@kernel.org; linux-
> fpga@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; bhu@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fpga: dfl: pci: reduce the scope of variable 'ret'
>
> Hi Rix:
>
> This patch is based on linux-next. There is an preceding patch
> (3c2760b78f90 "fpga: dfl: pci: fix return value of cci_pci_sriov_configure",
> Also see Fixes:) in linux-next but not merged in 5.7-rc1 yet.
> This patch is to fix the lkp warning brought by the previous one.
Yilun
Is it possible that commit id may be different for master then?
Thanks
Hao
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:56:47AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> > Please check the scope.
> >
> > On linus/master, the result of this change looks like
> >
> > static int cci_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pcidev, int num_vfs)
> > {
> > struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = pci_get_drvdata(pcidev);
> > struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev = drvdata->cdev;
> >
> > if (!num_vfs) {
> > /*
> > * disable SRIOV and then put released ports back to default
> > * PF access mode.
> > */
> > pci_disable_sriov(pcidev);
> >
> > dfl_fpga_cdev_config_ports_pf(cdev);
> >
> > } else {
> > int ret; <--- defined here
> >
> > /*
> > * before enable SRIOV, put released ports into VF access mode
> > * first of all.
> > */
> > ret = dfl_fpga_cdev_config_ports_vf(cdev, num_vfs);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > ret = pci_enable_sriov(pcidev, num_vfs);
> > if (ret)
> > dfl_fpga_cdev_config_ports_pf(cdev);
> > }
> >
> > return ret; <---- not in scope, not defined here
> > }
> >
> > Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-16 3:11 [PATCH 0/2] Bug fixes for FPGA DFL Xu Yilun
2020-04-16 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] fpga: dfl: pci: reduce the scope of variable 'ret' Xu Yilun
2020-04-16 8:04 ` Wu, Hao
2020-04-16 16:56 ` Tom Rix
2020-04-17 1:56 ` Xu Yilun
2020-04-17 3:05 ` Wu, Hao [this message]
2020-04-17 3:21 ` Xu Yilun
2020-04-17 5:55 ` Wu, Hao
2020-04-16 3:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] fpga: dfl: fix bug in port reset handshake Xu Yilun
2020-04-16 8:06 ` Wu, Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB381919B83DB49F937E3EDEEA85D90@DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=bhu@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).