From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Benjamin Tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
廖崇榮 <kt.liao@emc.com.tw>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: elantech: Enable SMBus on new (2018+) systems
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:54:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F7D6560C-789E-48E4-B2B9-BC2EBED16E7F@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO-hwJLPFzwkY+tkgeas8066CNygfyTY2EoVrximURx4dwQ0TQ@mail.gmail.com>
at 16:33, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 8:03 AM Kai-Heng Feng
> <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:
>> There are some new HP laptops with Elantech touchpad don't support
>> multitouch.
>>
>> Currently we use ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY() to check if SMBus is
>> supported, but in addition to firmware version, the bus type also
>> informs us if the IC can support SMBus, so also check that.
>>
>> In case of breaking old ICs, only enables SMBus on systems manufactured
>> after 2018, alongsides aforementioned checks.
>>
>> Lastly, consolidats all check into elantech_use_host_notify() and use it
>> to determine whether to use PS/2 or SMBus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Wording.
>> - Further restrain on older systems (< 2018).
>>
>> drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
>> b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
>> index 9fe075c137dc..2594130b0079 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
>> @@ -1799,6 +1799,39 @@ static int elantech_create_smbus(struct psmouse
>> *psmouse,
>> leave_breadcrumbs);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool elantech_use_host_notify(struct psmouse *psmouse,
>> + struct elantech_device_info *info)
>> +{
>> + bool host_notify = false;
>> +
>> + if (ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version))
>> + host_notify = true;
>> + else {
>> + switch (info->bus) {
>> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_ONLY:
>> + /* expected case */
>> + break;
>> + case ETP_BUS_SMB_ALERT_ONLY:
>> + /* fall-through */
>> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_ALERT:
>> + psmouse_dbg(psmouse, "Ignoring SMBus provider
>> through alert protocol.\n");
>> + break;
>> + case ETP_BUS_SMB_HST_NTFY_ONLY:
>> + /* fall-through */
>> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_HST_NTFY:
>> + host_notify = true;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + psmouse_dbg(psmouse,
>> + "Ignoring SMBus bus provider %d.\n",
>> + info->bus);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* SMbus implementation is stable after 2018 */
>> + return host_notify && (dmi_get_bios_year() >= 2018);
>
> Strictly speaking, the check for the year should be in the `switch
> (info->bus)`, but OTOH, laptops with ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY
> should be manufactured after 2018 too, so we should be good.
>
> Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Hi Dmitry,
Would it be possible to include this patch?
Kai-Heng
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
>
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * elantech_setup_smbus - called once the PS/2 devices are enumerated
>> * and decides to instantiate a SMBus InterTouch device.
>> @@ -1818,7 +1851,7 @@ static int elantech_setup_smbus(struct psmouse
>> *psmouse,
>> * i2c_blacklist_pnp_ids.
>> * Old ICs are up to the user to decide.
>> */
>> - if (!ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version) ||
>> + if (!elantech_use_host_notify(psmouse, info) ||
>> psmouse_matches_pnp_id(psmouse, i2c_blacklist_pnp_ids))
>> return -ENXIO;
>> }
>> @@ -1838,34 +1871,6 @@ static int elantech_setup_smbus(struct psmouse
>> *psmouse,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool elantech_use_host_notify(struct psmouse *psmouse,
>> - struct elantech_device_info *info)
>> -{
>> - if (ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version))
>> - return true;
>> -
>> - switch (info->bus) {
>> - case ETP_BUS_PS2_ONLY:
>> - /* expected case */
>> - break;
>> - case ETP_BUS_SMB_ALERT_ONLY:
>> - /* fall-through */
>> - case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_ALERT:
>> - psmouse_dbg(psmouse, "Ignoring SMBus provider through
>> alert protocol.\n");
>> - break;
>> - case ETP_BUS_SMB_HST_NTFY_ONLY:
>> - /* fall-through */
>> - case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_HST_NTFY:
>> - return true;
>> - default:
>> - psmouse_dbg(psmouse,
>> - "Ignoring SMBus bus provider %d.\n",
>> - info->bus);
>> - }
>> -
>> - return false;
>> -}
>> -
>> int elantech_init_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse)
>> {
>> struct elantech_device_info info;
>> —
>> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-11 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-21 7:02 [PATCH v2] Input: elantech: Enable SMBus on new (2018+) systems Kai-Heng Feng
2019-01-21 8:33 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2019-04-11 7:54 ` Kai-Heng Feng [this message]
2019-07-22 7:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-22 8:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-07-23 6:45 ` Kai-Heng Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F7D6560C-789E-48E4-B2B9-BC2EBED16E7F@canonical.com \
--to=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=kt.liao@emc.com.tw \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).