linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
To: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
Cc: "bbrezillon@kernel.org" <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	"miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	"marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>,
	"nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com" <nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [LINUX PATCH v13] rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand interface
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 05:21:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR02MB2623540BA389042E7795E071AF5A0@MWHPR02MB2623.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190328115106.i7ytk2uqno7i4h4u@laureti-dev>

Hi Helmut,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 5:21 PM
> To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> Cc: bbrezillon@kernel.org; miquel.raynal@bootlin.com; richard@nod.at;
> dwmw2@infradead.org; computersforpeace@gmail.com; marek.vasut@gmail.com; linux-
> mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>;
> nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v13] rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand
> interface
> 
> Hi Naga,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:13:59AM +0000, Naga Sureshkumar Relli wrote:
> > It's a on-die ECC capable device. Did u mentioned nand-ecc-mode = "on-die" in dts.
> > The same part I tested by mentioning "on-die" property in dts and it worked for me.
> > Please share the dts entries for NAND.
> > Also if it is x8 bus then please mention nand-bus-width = <8>; If it
> > is x16 mention nand-bus-width = <16>;
> 
> Thank you for pointing at the relevant properties. Indeed, these were missing in my previous
> tests. I am now using the following dt (generated from multiple fragments, giving the
> decompiled dt here):
> 
> | memory-controller@e000e000 {
> | 	#address-cells = <0x2>;
> | 	#size-cells = <0x1>;
> | 	status = "okay";
> | 	clock-names = "memclk", "apb_pclk";
> | 	clocks = <0x1 0xb 0x1 0x2c>;
> | 	compatible = "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1", "arm,primecell";
> | 	interrupt-parent = <0x4>;
> | 	interrupts = <0x0 0x12 0x4>;
> | 	ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xe1000000 0x1000000>;
> | 	reg = <0xe000e000 0x1000>;
> |
> | 	flash@e1000000 {
> | 		status = "okay";
> | 		compatible = "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1";
> | 		reg = <0x0 0x0 0x1000000>;
> | 		#address-cells = <0x1>;
> | 		#size-cells = <0x1>;
> | 		nand-ecc-mode = "on-die";
> | 		nand-ecc-algo = "hamming";
> | 		nand-bus-width = <0x8>;
> | 	};
> | };
> 
> With this dt, the device is successfully initialized and the data read is mostly intact. When
> using it with jffs2, I get loads of ECC errors though (offsets and lengths vary):
> 
> | jffs2: mtd->read(0x800 bytes from 0xb60000) returned ECC error
> 
> Reverting back to the out-of-tree driver (4.14), it works normally, so a hardware defect seems
> unlikely. I compared a register dump of the smc between those drivers and the only difference I
> could find was NAND timings (at 0xE000E180), which are much lower with the new drivers
> as it does not consume the arm,nand-cycle-* properties that the old driver consumed. I tried
> hard coding the previous timings, but the ECC errors persist. This leads me to conclude that
> timings are not the cause for what I am seeing.
> 
> Is there anything else I can try to diagnose it?
Thanks for trying with new dts.
Previously we will pass the nand-cycle-* through dts.
But now framework is giving all the timing information of SDR. So we will just configure those
Timings. I will recheck the driver about the timings.

Till now I tried mtd-utils(mtd-debug) and ubifs.
I haven't tried jffs2. Let me give a try and will let you know.

Thanks,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli.
> 
> Helmut

      reply	other threads:[~2019-03-29  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-09  6:37 [LINUX PATCH v13] rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand interface Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-03-04  9:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-03-04 11:46   ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-03-11  4:36     ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-03-26 13:27 ` Helmut Grohne
2019-03-27  9:13   ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-03-28 11:51     ` Helmut Grohne
2019-03-29  5:21       ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR02MB2623540BA389042E7795E071AF5A0@MWHPR02MB2623.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=nagasure@xilinx.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=michals@xilinx.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).