From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262706AbTD1BE3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:04:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262713AbTD1BE3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:04:29 -0400 Received: from user72.209.42.38.dsli.com ([209.42.38.72]:14391 "EHLO nolab.conman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262706AbTD1BE2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:04:28 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:16:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Grosberg To: Larry McVoy Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall. In-Reply-To: <20030428005925.GC27729@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Larry McVoy wrote: > If you do this, _please_ make it compat with NT. Actually, I thought about this. My first thought is this could benefit WINE running on Linux. Then (not like I'm a Wine expert by any means) I figured it might be an issue as far as having to do some preliminary wineserver setup work (if anybody on this list knows better than me, speak up!) But yeah, basically, something similar to NT's CreateProcess(). For the cases where the one-step process creation is sufficient. L8r, Mark G.