From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: vladislav.yasevich@hp.com, sri@us.ibm.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:49:10 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001211148310.13529@ask.diku.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100121.024337.57448535.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:22:38 +0100 (CET)
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> >> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >> >>
> >> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
> >> >> expression. Drop one initialization.
> >> >>
> >> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
> >> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >> >>
> >> >> // <smpl>
> >> >> @forall@
> >> >> idexpression *x;
> >> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
> >> >> @@
> >> >>
> >> >> x = f(...)
> >> >> ... when != x
> >> >> (
> >> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
> >> >> |
> >> >> * x = f(...)
> >> >> )
> >> >> // </smpl>
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> >>
> >> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
> >> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
> >
> > I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem.
> > If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you
> > received?
>
> You dropped Vlad' ACK in your re-submission.
>
> I'll fix it up this time, but please accumulate ACK's when
> resubmitting patches merely for the purpose of fixing some
> technical submission problem.
>
> Thanks.
OK, I will keep that in mind.
Is the new one better than the old one? Because in my local copies, they
are the same...
julia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-16 15:58 [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code Julia Lawall
2010-01-20 18:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
2010-01-20 23:03 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 10:21 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-21 10:22 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-21 10:43 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 10:49 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2010-01-21 13:08 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1001211148310.13529@ask.diku.dk \
--to=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).