From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] SEV-ES hypervisor support
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:35:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X8VJdxTKKkC7uEMh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8759948d-aa0b-3929-bda6-488b6788489a@redhat.com>
+Isaku and Xiaoyao
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 30/11/20 19:14, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > TDX also selectively blocks/skips portions of other ioctl()s so that the
> > > > TDX code itself can yell loudly if e.g. .get_cpl() is invoked. The event
> > > > injection restrictions are due to direct injection not being allowed (except
> > > > for NMIs); all IRQs have to be routed through APICv (posted interrupts) and
> > > > exception injection is completely disallowed.
> > > >
> > > > kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events:
> > > > if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.guest_state_protected)
> > > > events->interrupt.shadow = kvm_x86_ops.get_interrupt_shadow(vcpu);
> > > Perhaps an alternative implementation can enter the vCPU with immediate exit
> > > until no events are pending, and then return all zeroes?
> >
> > This can't work. If the guest has STI blocking, e.g. it did STI->TDVMCALL with
> > a valid vIRQ in GUEST_RVI, then events->interrupt.shadow should technically be
> > non-zero to reflect the STI blocking. But, the immediate exit (a hardware IRQ
> > for TDX guests) will cause VM-Exit before the guest can execute any instructions
> > and thus the guest will never clear STI blocking and never consume the pending
> > event. Or there could be a valid vIRQ, but GUEST_RFLAGS.IF=0, in which case KVM
> > would need to run the guest for an indeterminate amount of time to wait for the
> > vIRQ to be consumed.
>
> Delayed interrupts are fine, since they are injected according to RVI and
> the posted interrupt descriptor. I'm thinking more of events (exceptions
> and interrupts) that caused an EPT violation exit and were recorded in the
> IDT-vectored info field.
Ah. As is, I don't believe KVM has access to this information. TDX-Module
handles the actual EPT violation, as well as event reinjection. The EPT
violation reported by SEAMRET is synthesized, and IIRC the IDT-vectoring field
is not readable.
Regardless, is there an actual a problem with having a "pending" exception that
isn't reported to userspace? Obviously the info needs to be migrated, but that
will be taken care of by virtue of migrating the VMCS.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 20:15 [RFC PATCH 00/35] SEV-ES hypervisor support Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 01/35] KVM: SVM: Remove the call to sev_platform_status() during setup Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 02/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES capability in KVM Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 03/35] KVM: SVM: Add indirect access to the VM save area Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/35] KVM: SVM: Make GHCB accessor functions available to the hypervisor Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/35] KVM: SVM: Add initial support for SEV-ES GHCB access to KVM Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200914205801.GA7084@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-15 13:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 16:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-16 14:54 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 06/35] KVM: SVM: Add required changes to support intercepts under SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/35] KVM: SVM: Modify DRx register intercepts for an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/35] KVM: SVM: Prevent debugging under SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 21:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 13:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 16:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 20:13 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-16 15:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-16 16:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-16 16:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-16 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-16 20:27 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-16 22:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-17 16:27 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/35] KVM: SVM: Do not emulate MMIO " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 21:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 13:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/35] KVM: SVM: Cannot re-initialize the VMCB after shutdown with SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 11/35] KVM: SVM: Prepare for SEV-ES exit handling in the sev.c file Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200915172148.GE8420@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-16 16:22 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 12/35] KVM: SVM: Add initial support for a VMGEXIT VMEXIT Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 13/35] KVM: SVM: Create trace events for VMGEXIT processing Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 14/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x002 Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 15/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x004 Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 16/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x100 Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 17/35] KVM: SVM: Create trace events for VMGEXIT MSR protocol processing Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 18/35] KVM: SVM: Support MMIO for an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 19/35] KVM: SVM: Support port IO operations " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 20/35] KVM: SVM: Add SEV/SEV-ES support for intercepting INVD Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 15:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 21/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for EFER write traps for an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200914220800.GI7192@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-15 15:45 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 22/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR0 " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 15:56 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-11-30 18:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 23/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR4 " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 18:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 24/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR8 " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 15:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 25/35] KVM: x86: Update __get_sregs() / __set_sregs() to support SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 21:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 14:19 ` Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200915163342.GC8420@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-15 20:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 22:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 18:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 19:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 26/35] KVM: SVM: Guest FPU state save/restore not needed for SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200914213917.GD7192@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-15 14:25 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 16:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 27/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for booting APs for an " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 28/35] KVM: X86: Update kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 21:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 14:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 29/35] KVM: SVM: Add NMI support " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 30/35] KVM: SVM: Set the encryption mask for the SVM host save area Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 31/35] KVM: SVM: Update ASID allocation to support SEV-ES guests Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 32/35] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU creation/loading Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 33/35] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU loading Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 34/35] KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guests Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 35/35] KVM: SVM: Provide support to launch and run an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:59 ` [RFC PATCH 00/35] SEV-ES hypervisor support Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 17:22 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 17:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 20:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2020-09-16 0:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-13 20:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-11-30 15:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 16:06 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-11-30 18:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 18:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 18:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 19:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-11-30 20:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X8VJdxTKKkC7uEMh@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).