linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
	Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] kvm: x86/mmu: change TDP MMU yield function returns to match cond_resched
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:38:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YAh4q6ZCOw3qDzHP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112181041.356734-5-bgardon@google.com>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021, Ben Gardon wrote:
> Currently the TDP MMU yield / cond_resched functions either return
> nothing or return true if the TLBs were not flushed. These are confusing
> semantics, especially when making control flow decisions in calling
> functions.
> 
> To clean things up, change both functions to have the same
> return value semantics as cond_resched: true if the thread yielded,
> false if it did not. If the function yielded in the _flush_ version,
> then the TLBs will have been flushed.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 2ef8615f9dba..b2784514ca2d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -413,8 +413,15 @@ static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
>  			 _mmu->shadow_root_level, _start, _end)
>  
>  /*
> - * Flush the TLB if the process should drop kvm->mmu_lock.
> - * Return whether the caller still needs to flush the tlb.
> + * Flush the TLB and yield if the MMU lock is contended or this thread needs to
> + * return control to the scheduler.
> + *
> + * If this function yields, it will also reset the tdp_iter's walk over the
> + * paging structure and the calling function should allow the iterator to
> + * continue its traversal from the paging structure root.
> + *
> + * Return true if this function yielded, the TLBs were flushed, and the
> + * iterator's traversal was reset. Return false if a yield was not needed.
>   */
>  static bool tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter)
>  {
> @@ -422,18 +429,30 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *it
>  		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>  		cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  		tdp_iter_refresh_walk(iter);
> -		return false;
> -	} else {
>  		return true;
> -	}
> +	} else
> +		return false;

Kernel style is to have curly braces on all branches if any branch has 'em.  Or,
omit the else since the taken branch always returns.  I think I prefer the latter?

>  }
>  
> -static void tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter)
> +/*
> + * Yield if the MMU lock is contended or this thread needs to return control
> + * to the scheduler.
> + *
> + * If this function yields, it will also reset the tdp_iter's walk over the
> + * paging structure and the calling function should allow the iterator to
> + * continue its traversal from the paging structure root.
> + *
> + * Return true if this function yielded and the iterator's traversal was reset.
> + * Return false if a yield was not needed.
> + */
> +static bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter)
>  {
>  	if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock)) {
>  		cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  		tdp_iter_refresh_walk(iter);
> -	}
> +		return true;
> +	} else
> +		return false;

Same here.

>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -470,7 +489,8 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
>  
>  		if (can_yield)
> -			flush_needed = tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm, &iter);
> +			flush_needed = !tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm,
> +									&iter);

As with the existing code, I'd let this poke out.  Alternatively, this could be
written as:

		flush_needed = !can_yield ||
			       !tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm, &iter);

>  		else
>  			flush_needed = true;
>  	}
> @@ -1072,7 +1092,7 @@ static void zap_collapsible_spte_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>  
>  		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
>  
> -		spte_set = tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm, &iter);
> +		spte_set = !tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm, &iter);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (spte_set)
> -- 
> 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-12 18:10 [PATCH 00/24] Allow parallel page faults with TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/24] locking/rwlocks: Add contention detection for rwlocks Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/24] sched: Add needbreak " Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/24] sched: Add cond_resched_rwlock Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/24] kvm: x86/mmu: change TDP MMU yield function returns to match cond_resched Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 18:38   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-01-21 20:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 14:11     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Fix yielding in TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-22  1:06     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Skip no-op changes in TDP MMU functions Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:51   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-25 23:51     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add comment on __tdp_mmu_set_spte Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 14:13   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add lockdep when setting a TDP MMU SPTE Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:58   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:13   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Don't redundantly clear TDP MMU pt memory Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 20:06   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Factor out handle disconnected pt Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 20:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 11/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Put TDP MMU PT walks in RCU read-critical section Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 22:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 12/24] kvm: x86/kvm: RCU dereference tdp mmu page table links Ben Gardon
2021-01-22 18:32   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 18:17     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 13/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Only free tdp_mmu pages after a grace period Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 14/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock lock / unlock in a function Ben Gardon
2021-01-13  2:35   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 15/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock cond_resched and needbreak Ben Gardon
2021-01-21  0:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-21 20:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 14:38     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 17:47       ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 17:55         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 18:11           ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 20:47             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-27 20:08               ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-27 20:55                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-27 21:20                   ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-28  8:18                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 16/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock assertions Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 14:29   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 17/24] kvm: mmu: Move mmu_lock to struct kvm_arch Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 18/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Use an rwlock for the x86 TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-21  0:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 19/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Protect tdp_mmu_pages with a lock Ben Gardon
2021-01-21 19:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-21 21:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:27       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 21:47         ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 22:02         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 22:09           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-27 12:40           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 13:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 21:07     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 20/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add atomic option for setting SPTEs Ben Gardon
2021-01-13  0:05   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-26 14:21   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 21/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Use atomic ops to set SPTEs in TDP MMU map Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 22/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Flush TLBs after zap in TDP MMU PF handler Ben Gardon
2021-01-21  0:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 23/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Freeze SPTEs in disconnected pages Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 24/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Allow parallel page faults for the TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-21  0:55   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 21:57     ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-27 17:14       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 13:37   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YAh4q6ZCOw3qDzHP@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).