From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@protonmail.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Subject: Re: Kernel version numbers after 4.9.255 and 4.4.255
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 08:22:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YB5DmnPd/Er0+yem@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b12bac9-1b4e-ec4a-8a45-5eb3f1dbbeca@cybernetics.com>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:31:05PM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> On 2/4/21 6:00 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > Agreed. But currently, sublevel won't "wrap", it will "overflow" to
> > patchlevel. And that might be a problem. So we might need to update the
> > header generation using e.g. "sublevel & 0xff" (wrap around) or
> > "sublevel > 255 : 255 : sublevel" (be monotonic and get stuck at 255).
> >
> > In both LINUX_VERSION_CODE generation and KERNEL_VERSION proper.
>
> My preference would be to be monotonic and get stuck at 255 to avoid
> breaking out-of-tree modules.
I really do not care about out-of-tree modules sorry, as there's nothing
we can do about them. And internal kernel apis are always changing,
even in stable/lts releases, so changing this type of thing for them
should not be a big deal as maintainers of this type of code always have
to do that.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-06 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 5:59 Kernel version numbers after 4.9.255 and 4.4.255 Jari Ruusu
2021-02-04 6:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-04 7:26 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-02-04 8:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-04 11:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-02-04 16:28 ` David Laight
2021-02-04 16:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-04 20:19 ` Christoph Biedl
2021-02-05 6:52 ` Greg KH
2021-02-05 17:31 ` Tony Battersby
2021-02-05 18:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-02-06 7:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-06 9:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-02-06 9:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-06 9:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-02-06 10:18 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-06 11:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-02-06 7:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-02-05 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2021-02-05 9:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-05 18:44 ` Pavel Machek
2021-02-06 7:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YB5DmnPd/Er0+yem@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=jariruusu@protonmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel.bfrz@manchmal.in-ulm.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).