From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@intel.com>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/feat_ctl: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:20:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQgbSLYfNUL+WqPg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad88a2ed-536e-deae-2428-278346a43d30@intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021, Zeng Guang wrote:
> On 7/29/2021 7:44 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021, Zeng Guang wrote:
> > > @@ -42,6 +44,13 @@ static void init_vmx_capabilities(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > > rdmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2, &ign, &supported);
> > > c->vmx_capability[SECONDARY_CTLS] = supported;
> > > + /*
> > > + * For tertiary execution controls MSR, it's actually a 64bit allowed-1.
> > > + */
> > > + rdmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS3, &ign, &supported);
> > > + c->vmx_capability[TERTIARY_CTLS_LOW] = ign;
> > > + c->vmx_capability[TERTIARY_CTLS_HIGH] = supported;
> > Assuming only the lower 32 bits are going to be used for the near future (next
> > few years), what about defining just TERTIARY_CTLS_LOW and then doing:
> >
> > /*
> > * Tertiary controls are 64-bit allowed-1, so unlikely other MSRs, the
> > * upper bits are ignored (because they're not used, yet...).
> > */
> > rdmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS3, &supported, &ign);
> > c->vmx_capability[TERTIARY_CTLS_LOW] = supported;
> >
> > I.e. punt the ugliness issue down the road a few years.
> Prefer to keep it complete, and use new variables like low/high consistent
> with its function meaning. Ok for that ?
Ya, either way works.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-02 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-16 6:48 [PATCH 0/5] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
2021-07-16 6:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/feat_ctl: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2021-07-28 23:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-29 15:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-02 8:22 ` Zeng Guang
2021-08-02 16:20 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-07-16 6:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation Zeng Guang
2021-07-16 6:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2021-07-29 0:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-02 6:59 ` Zeng Guang
2021-07-16 6:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well Zeng Guang
2021-07-16 6:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Support interrupt dispatch in x2APIC mode with APIC-write VM exit Zeng Guang
2021-07-16 6:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2021-07-16 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-17 3:55 ` Zeng Guang
2021-07-18 20:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-19 12:38 ` Zeng Guang
2021-07-19 13:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-20 1:07 ` Zeng Guang
2021-07-19 13:16 ` Zeng Guang
2021-07-16 9:25 ` [PATCH 0/5] IPI virtualization support for VM Wanpeng Li
2021-07-17 1:46 ` Zeng Guang
2021-07-19 7:26 ` Zeng Guang
2021-07-19 7:37 ` Wanpeng Li
2021-07-23 6:15 ` Zeng Guang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQgbSLYfNUL+WqPg@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).