From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
mike.leach@linaro.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] perf cs-etm: Improve Coresight zero timestamp warning
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 10:25:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQlD06FZ3SyBeolc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802151710.GB148327@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Em Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 11:17:10PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:58:04PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > Only show the warning if the user hasn't already set timeless mode and
> > improve the text because there was ambiguity around the meaning of '...'
> >
> > Change the warning to a UI warning instead of printing straight to
> > stderr because this corrupts the UI when perf report TUI is used. The UI
> > warning function also handles printing to stderr when in perf script
> > mode.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> > index 3e1a05bc82cc..5084bd2ca6eb 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> > @@ -324,8 +324,11 @@ cs_etm_decoder__do_hard_timestamp(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> > * underflow.
> > */
> > packet_queue->cs_timestamp = 0;
> > - WARN_ONCE(true, "Zero Coresight timestamp found at Idx:%" OCSD_TRC_IDX_STR
> > - ". Decoding may be improved with --itrace=Z...\n", indx);
> > + if (!cs_etm__etmq_is_timeless(etmq))
> > + pr_warning_once("Zero Coresight timestamp found at Idx:%" OCSD_TRC_IDX_STR
> > + ". Decoding may be improved by prepending 'Z' to your current --itrace arguments.\n",
> > + indx);
> > +
> > } else if (packet_queue->instr_count > elem->timestamp) {
> > /*
> > * Sanity check that the elem->timestamp - packet_queue->instr_count would not
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-03 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 15:57 [RFC PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Warning fixes James Clark
2021-07-29 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] perf tools: Add WARN_ONCE equivalent for UI warnings James Clark
2021-08-02 14:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-07-29 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] perf tools: Re-add annotate_warned functionality James Clark
2021-07-29 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Add disassembly warnings for annotate --stdio James Clark
2021-07-29 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] perf tools: Add flag for tracking warnings of missing DSOs James Clark
2021-07-29 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] perf cs-etm: Improve Coresight zero timestamp warning James Clark
2021-08-02 15:17 ` Leo Yan
2021-08-03 13:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2021-07-29 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] perf cs-etm: Add warnings for missing DSOs James Clark
2021-08-02 14:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-02 17:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-08-03 8:06 ` Mike Leach
2021-08-02 15:41 ` Leo Yan
2021-08-03 13:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-03 14:01 ` Leo Yan
2021-08-05 12:59 ` James Clark
2021-08-06 18:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQlD06FZ3SyBeolc@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).