From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
ndesaulniers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] objtool,x86: Replace alternatives with .retpoline_sites
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:43:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWhQHbtOysHh2WWu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013201135.ftaztysa4bdjedqd@treble>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 01:11:35PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Guess it shouldn't be called arch_rewrite_retpolines() anymore. And it
> can be moved to check.c next to create_static_call_sections().
>
> Also is it possible to remove the arch_is_retpoline() check in
> get_alt_entry()? I'm having trouble remembering why that was needed in
> the first place.
Makes sense...
---
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
@@ -711,52 +711,6 @@ const char *arch_ret_insn(int len)
return ret[len-1];
}
-int arch_rewrite_retpolines(struct objtool_file *file)
-{
- struct instruction *insn;
- struct section *sec;
- int idx;
-
- sec = find_section_by_name(file->elf, ".retpoline_sites");
- if (sec) {
- WARN("file already has .retpoline_sites, skipping");
- return 0;
- }
-
- idx = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->retpoline_call_list, call_node)
- idx++;
-
- if (!idx)
- return 0;
-
- sec = elf_create_section(file->elf, ".retpoline_sites", 0,
- sizeof(int), idx);
- if (!sec) {
- WARN("elf_create_section: .retpoline_sites");
- return -1;
- }
-
- idx = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->retpoline_call_list, call_node) {
-
- int *site = (int *)sec->data->d_buf + idx;
- *site = 0;
-
- if (elf_add_reloc_to_insn(file->elf, sec,
- idx * sizeof(int),
- R_X86_64_PC32,
- insn->sec, insn->offset)) {
- WARN("elf_add_reloc_to_insn: .retpoline_sites");
- return -1;
- }
-
- idx++;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
int arch_decode_hint_reg(u8 sp_reg, int *base)
{
switch (sp_reg) {
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -683,6 +683,52 @@ static int create_static_call_sections(s
return 0;
}
+static int create_retpoline_sites_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
+{
+ struct instruction *insn;
+ struct section *sec;
+ int idx;
+
+ sec = find_section_by_name(file->elf, ".retpoline_sites");
+ if (sec) {
+ WARN("file already has .retpoline_sites, skipping");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ idx = 0;
+ list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->retpoline_call_list, call_node)
+ idx++;
+
+ if (!idx)
+ return 0;
+
+ sec = elf_create_section(file->elf, ".retpoline_sites", 0,
+ sizeof(int), idx);
+ if (!sec) {
+ WARN("elf_create_section: .retpoline_sites");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ idx = 0;
+ list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->retpoline_call_list, call_node) {
+
+ int *site = (int *)sec->data->d_buf + idx;
+ *site = 0;
+
+ if (elf_add_reloc_to_insn(file->elf, sec,
+ idx * sizeof(int),
+ R_X86_64_PC32,
+ insn->sec, insn->offset)) {
+ WARN("elf_add_reloc_to_insn: .retpoline_sites");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ idx++;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int create_mcount_loc_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
{
struct section *sec;
@@ -1950,11 +1996,6 @@ static void mark_rodata(struct objtool_f
file->rodata = found;
}
-__weak int arch_rewrite_retpolines(struct objtool_file *file)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static int decode_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
{
int ret;
@@ -2027,15 +2068,6 @@ static int decode_sections(struct objtoo
if (ret)
return ret;
- /*
- * Must be after add_special_section_alts(), since this will emit
- * alternatives. Must be after add_{jump,call}_destination(), since
- * those create the call insn lists.
- */
- ret = arch_rewrite_retpolines(file);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
return 0;
}
@@ -3438,6 +3470,13 @@ int check(struct objtool_file *file)
goto out;
warnings += ret;
+ if (retpoline) {
+ ret = create_retpoline_sites_sections(file);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out;
+ warnings += ret;
+ }
+
if (mcount) {
ret = create_mcount_loc_sections(file);
if (ret < 0)
--- a/tools/objtool/special.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/special.c
@@ -109,14 +109,6 @@ static int get_alt_entry(struct elf *elf
return -1;
}
- /*
- * Skip retpoline .altinstr_replacement... we already rewrite the
- * instructions for retpolines anyway, see arch_is_retpoline()
- * usage in add_{call,jump}_destinations().
- */
- if (arch_is_retpoline(new_reloc->sym))
- return 1;
-
reloc_to_sec_off(new_reloc, &alt->new_sec, &alt->new_off);
/* _ASM_EXTABLE_EX hack */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 12:22 [PATCH 0/9] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 1/9] objtool,x86: Replace alternatives with .retpoline_sites Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 13:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-13 20:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-14 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/retpoline: Remove unused replacement symbols Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/asm: Fix register order Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 20:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/alternative: Implement .retpoline_sites support Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 14:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-13 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 17:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-14 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 20:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 21:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 22:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 22:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-13 20:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-19 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-19 16:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-19 16:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-20 8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-20 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 21:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 22:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 22:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-15 14:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-15 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-18 23:06 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-10-19 0:25 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-10-19 9:47 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-10-19 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-19 15:37 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-10-19 18:00 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-10-19 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-19 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/alternative: Handle Jcc __x86_indirect_thunk_\reg Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 20:11 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-13 21:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/alternative: Try inline spectre_v2=retpoline,amd Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/alternative: Add debug prints to apply_retpolines() Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86,bugs: Unconditionally allow spectre_v2=retpoline,amd Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] bpf,x86: Respect X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE* Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13 21:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 21:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-14 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-14 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-20 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YWhQHbtOysHh2WWu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).