From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>,
0day robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@lists.01.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [fs/exec] 80bd5afdd8: xfstests.generic.633.fail
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:19:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yff9+tIDAvYM5EO/@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220131150819.iuqlz3rz6q7cheap@wittgenstein>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 04:08:19PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:43:52PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> I can fix this rather simply in our upstream fstests with:
>
> static char *argv[] = {
> "",
> };
>
> I guess.
>
> But doesn't
>
> static char *argv[] = {
> NULL,
> };
>
> seem something that should work especially with execveat()?
The problem is that the exec'ed program sees an argc of 0, which is the
problem we're trying to work around in the kernel (instead of leaving
it to ld.so to fix for suid programs).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 0:07 [PATCH v3] fs/exec: require argv[0] presence in do_execveat_common() Ariadne Conill
2022-01-27 5:29 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-27 16:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-01-31 14:43 ` [fs/exec] 80bd5afdd8: xfstests.generic.633.fail kernel test robot
2022-01-31 15:08 ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-31 15:19 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-01-31 15:37 ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-31 15:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-31 16:14 ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-31 17:13 ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-31 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2022-01-31 22:49 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-01 13:28 ` Christian Brauner
2022-02-01 13:28 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yff9+tIDAvYM5EO/@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ariadne@dereferenced.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).