From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59469C43219 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241058AbiBOPqB (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:46:01 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:35652 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240903AbiBOPpk (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:45:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42C47B250C; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id v129so11578870wme.2; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:42:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Y+bDBcR0c7hXTx1K3Rg+9ZhzPuyWp38ngyyjtP3qjek=; b=gxbu+Cbr/yPt9Wjr3BEE1hIdQA9g/qHkFZNkOR+9Sh63WS+YisL/YE98ncV5IgXR8b /GwFcW+uoi88TzXeU3fjg4I+HCECR5hbsaknN2/hriRa3YvYa+c6tgbw4FZnbjhONUZx JQrVsvbCpAWNUJxZvIoIr7wB+BDmOu8F+Sx3BMQA7ruAhVu2Olkmqk684Xh/WkidLTeh w7jAjz8UqaWIZZqHgnIiR2Mn/0+wna1K5cf03gj+yQ5KzkqvhHpsqjeDrqj/WMPIog4l Sp4zUsTNs7iiynwce3UiEbCxkqhSDdWS3385J7KwmA3vBMr5wNltao6YGsVZgy5PdZbM iyXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Y+bDBcR0c7hXTx1K3Rg+9ZhzPuyWp38ngyyjtP3qjek=; b=3gThKW/iNqX+n/4K96sWNteM+ZrrR/HKybl7f/LwBdC5YH6QJHmqnV6jE59txe8BDk tcRBNR3phcN6TSo0fMesz5y1Wu7zJFVpdRN3mOpx/BsbyvG648Rcn2AkgtXagLKuVESf ql1arz+IKlrlq0NjVA8x0ql/VEUoDdgZiwdo4HgTTSblLeyb+Vl7QZgEo66V/jHsa7CA 3u1Q2IrnPG+nop/Hd4fntQDzygruyZf90b3M8iOSujSnDgBM3dkgqHjGGaDaTDLCToza MzIqlHqGkKbqq/DNp+uE4W1IFFkEuvpMN8XG7+xGuafg+EjiftGurnq9z0i3JcJ9s76H Hhdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530o4Yg3DZrqFDGl9OlW9gKATkVO0tuUVFuIWlyNnOmaN8rdOYBA +uJd1zbg27QTQM/A9Oq3rhc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhEWW2p5tjCHxFPrbLpNe6DQ1lIp8aOpR92m4Pd0ZBfU8WztlyZTGyoLsHkYCuCRzTR4z7ww== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2e53:: with SMTP id q19mr3485312wmf.189.1644939755764; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm15167469wmi.31.2022.02.15.07.42.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:42:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:42:33 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/49] 4.19.230-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220214092448.285381753@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220214092448.285381753@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:25:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.230 release. > There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:24:36 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/759 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip