linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnaldo.melo@gmail.com
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH FYI] tools headers UAPI: Sync drm/i915_drm.h with the kernel sources
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:17:08 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkSChHqaOApscFQ0@kernel.org> (raw)

Just FYI, I'm carrying this on the perf tools tree.

- Arnaldo

---

To pick up the changes in:

  caa574ffc4aaf4f2 ("drm/i915/uapi: document behaviour for DG2 64K support")

That don't add any new ioctl, so no changes in tooling.

This silences this perf build warning:

  Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h' differs from latest version at 'include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h'
  diff -u tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
index 914ebd9290e5192d..05c3642aaece4429 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
@@ -1118,10 +1118,16 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 {
 	/**
 	 * When the EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED flag is specified this is populated by
 	 * the user with the GTT offset at which this object will be pinned.
+	 *
 	 * When the I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC flag is specified this must contain the
 	 * presumed_offset of the object.
+	 *
 	 * During execbuffer2 the kernel populates it with the value of the
 	 * current GTT offset of the object, for future presumed_offset writes.
+	 *
+	 * See struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext for the rules when dealing with
+	 * alignment restrictions with I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, on devices with
+	 * minimum page sizes, like DG2.
 	 */
 	__u64 offset;
 
@@ -3144,11 +3150,40 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext {
 	 *
 	 * The (page-aligned) allocated size for the object will be returned.
 	 *
-	 * Note that for some devices we have might have further minimum
-	 * page-size restrictions(larger than 4K), like for device local-memory.
-	 * However in general the final size here should always reflect any
-	 * rounding up, if for example using the I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS
-	 * extension to place the object in device local-memory.
+	 *
+	 * DG2 64K min page size implications:
+	 *
+	 * On discrete platforms, starting from DG2, we have to contend with GTT
+	 * page size restrictions when dealing with I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE
+	 * objects.  Specifically the hardware only supports 64K or larger GTT
+	 * page sizes for such memory. The kernel will already ensure that all
+	 * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE memory is allocated using 64K or larger page
+	 * sizes underneath.
+	 *
+	 * Note that the returned size here will always reflect any required
+	 * rounding up done by the kernel, i.e 4K will now become 64K on devices
+	 * such as DG2.
+	 *
+	 * Special DG2 GTT address alignment requirement:
+	 *
+	 * The GTT alignment will also need to be at least 2M for such objects.
+	 *
+	 * Note that due to how the hardware implements 64K GTT page support, we
+	 * have some further complications:
+	 *
+	 *   1) The entire PDE (which covers a 2MB virtual address range), must
+	 *   contain only 64K PTEs, i.e mixing 4K and 64K PTEs in the same
+	 *   PDE is forbidden by the hardware.
+	 *
+	 *   2) We still need to support 4K PTEs for I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM
+	 *   objects.
+	 *
+	 * To keep things simple for userland, we mandate that any GTT mappings
+	 * must be aligned to and rounded up to 2MB. The kernel will internally
+	 * pad them out to the next 2MB boundary. As this only wastes virtual
+	 * address space and avoids userland having to copy any needlessly
+	 * complicated PDE sharing scheme (coloring) and only affects DG2, this
+	 * is deemed to be a good compromise.
 	 */
 	__u64 size;
 	/**
-- 
2.35.1


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YkSChHqaOApscFQ0@kernel.org \
    --to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).