From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Cc: surenb@google.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
tj@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] sched/psi: add PSI_IRQ to track IRQ/SOFTIRQ pressure
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:26:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yt7gOhbqYzIKyhfv@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721040439.2651-10-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:04:39PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> Now PSI already tracked workload pressure stall information for
> CPU, memory and IO. Apart from these, IRQ/SOFTIRQ could have
> obvious impact on some workload productivity, such as web service
> workload.
>
> When CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING, we can get IRQ/SOFTIRQ delta time
> from update_rq_clock_task(), in which we can record that delta
> to CPU curr task's cgroups as PSI_IRQ_FULL status.
>
> Note we don't use PSI_IRQ_SOME since IRQ/SOFTIRQ always happen in
> the current task on the CPU, make nothing productive could run
> even if it were runnable, so we only use PSI_IRQ_FULL.
That sounds reasonable.
> For performance impact consideration, this is enabled by default when
> CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING, but can be disabled by kernel cmdline
> parameter "psi_irq=".
If there isn't a concrete usecase already, let's not add another
commandline parameter for now.
> @@ -63,9 +64,11 @@ enum psi_states {
> PSI_MEM_FULL,
> PSI_CPU_SOME,
> PSI_CPU_FULL,
> + PSI_IRQ_SOME,
> + PSI_IRQ_FULL,
> /* Only per-CPU, to weigh the CPU in the global average: */
> PSI_NONIDLE,
> - NR_PSI_STATES = 7,
> + NR_PSI_STATES = 9,
> };
Unfortunately, this grows the psi state touched by the scheduler into
a second cacheline. :( Please reclaim space first.
I think we can remove the NR_CPU task count, which frees up one
u32. Something like the below diff should work (untested!)
And you should be able to remove PSI_IRQ_SOME, since it's not used
anyway. Then we'd be good to go.
diff --git a/include/linux/psi_types.h b/include/linux/psi_types.h
index c7fe7c089718..31dc76e2d8ea 100644
--- a/include/linux/psi_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/psi_types.h
@@ -15,13 +15,6 @@ enum psi_task_count {
NR_IOWAIT,
NR_MEMSTALL,
NR_RUNNING,
- /*
- * This can't have values other than 0 or 1 and could be
- * implemented as a bit flag. But for now we still have room
- * in the first cacheline of psi_group_cpu, and this way we
- * don't have to special case any state tracking for it.
- */
- NR_ONCPU,
/*
* For IO and CPU stalls the presence of running/oncpu tasks
* in the domain means a partial rather than a full stall.
@@ -39,9 +32,11 @@ enum psi_task_count {
#define TSK_IOWAIT (1 << NR_IOWAIT)
#define TSK_MEMSTALL (1 << NR_MEMSTALL)
#define TSK_RUNNING (1 << NR_RUNNING)
-#define TSK_ONCPU (1 << NR_ONCPU)
#define TSK_MEMSTALL_RUNNING (1 << NR_MEMSTALL_RUNNING)
+/* Only one task can be scheduled, no corresponding task count */
+#define TSK_ONCPU (1 << NR_PSI_TASK_COUNTS)
+
/* Resources that workloads could be stalled on */
enum psi_res {
PSI_IO,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
index a4fa3aadfcba..232e1dbfad46 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void __init psi_init(void)
group_init(&psi_system);
}
-static bool test_state(unsigned int *tasks, enum psi_states state)
+static bool test_state(unsigned int *tasks, enum psi_states state, bool oncpu)
{
switch (state) {
case PSI_IO_SOME:
@@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ static bool test_state(unsigned int *tasks, enum psi_states state)
return unlikely(tasks[NR_MEMSTALL] &&
tasks[NR_RUNNING] == tasks[NR_MEMSTALL_RUNNING]);
case PSI_CPU_SOME:
- return unlikely(tasks[NR_RUNNING] > tasks[NR_ONCPU]);
+ return unlikely(tasks[NR_RUNNING] > oncpu);
case PSI_CPU_FULL:
- return unlikely(tasks[NR_RUNNING] && !tasks[NR_ONCPU]);
+ return unlikely(tasks[NR_RUNNING] && !oncpu);
case PSI_NONIDLE:
return tasks[NR_IOWAIT] || tasks[NR_MEMSTALL] ||
tasks[NR_RUNNING];
@@ -692,9 +692,9 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
bool wake_clock)
{
struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
- u32 state_mask = 0;
unsigned int t, m;
enum psi_states s;
+ u32 state_mask;
groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu);
@@ -710,6 +710,26 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
record_times(groupc, now);
+ /*
+ * Start with TSK_ONCPU, which doesn't have a corresponding
+ * task count - it's just a boolean flag directly encoded in
+ * the state mask. Clear, set, or carry the current state if
+ * no changes are requested.
+ */
+ if (clear & TSK_ONCPU) {
+ state_mask = 0;
+ clear &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
+ } else if (set & TSK_ONCPU) {
+ state_mask = TSK_ONCPU;
+ set &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
+ } else {
+ state_mask = groupc->state_mask & TSK_ONCPU;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The rest of the state mask is calculated based on the task
+ * counts. Update those first, then construct the mask.
+ */
for (t = 0, m = clear; m; m &= ~(1 << t), t++) {
if (!(m & (1 << t)))
continue;
@@ -729,9 +749,8 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
if (set & (1 << t))
groupc->tasks[t]++;
- /* Calculate state mask representing active states */
for (s = 0; s < NR_PSI_STATES; s++) {
- if (test_state(groupc->tasks, s))
+ if (test_state(groupc->tasks, s, state_mask & TSK_ONCPU))
state_mask |= (1 << s);
}
@@ -743,7 +762,7 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
* task in a cgroup is in_memstall, the corresponding groupc
* on that cpu is in PSI_MEM_FULL state.
*/
- if (unlikely(groupc->tasks[NR_ONCPU] && cpu_curr(cpu)->in_memstall))
+ if (unlikely((state_mask & TSK_ONCPU) && cpu_curr(cpu)->in_memstall))
state_mask |= (1 << PSI_MEM_FULL);
groupc->state_mask = state_mask;
@@ -847,7 +866,8 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
iter = NULL;
while ((group = iterate_groups(next, &iter))) {
if (identical_state &&
- per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->tasks[NR_ONCPU]) {
+ (per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->state_mask &
+ TSK_ONCPU)) {
common = group;
break;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-25 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-21 4:04 [PATCH 0/9] sched/psi: some optimization and extension Chengming Zhou
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched/psi: fix periodic aggregation shut off Chengming Zhou
2022-07-25 15:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-07-25 15:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-07-26 13:28 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched/psi: optimize task switch inside shared cgroups again Chengming Zhou
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] sched/psi: move private helpers to sched/stats.h Chengming Zhou
2022-07-25 16:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 4/9] sched/psi: don't change task psi_flags when migrate CPU/group Chengming Zhou
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 5/9] sched/psi: don't create cgroup PSI files when psi_disabled Chengming Zhou
2022-07-25 16:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 6/9] sched/psi: save percpu memory when !psi_cgroups_enabled Chengming Zhou
2022-07-25 16:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 7/9] sched/psi: cache parent psi_group to speed up groups iterate Chengming Zhou
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 8/9] sched/psi: add kernel cmdline parameter psi_inner_cgroup Chengming Zhou
2022-07-25 16:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-07-26 13:38 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-07-26 17:54 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-03 12:17 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-08-03 17:58 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-03 19:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-08-03 19:48 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-04 13:51 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-08-04 16:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-08-04 2:02 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-21 4:04 ` [PATCH 9/9] sched/psi: add PSI_IRQ to track IRQ/SOFTIRQ pressure Chengming Zhou
2022-07-21 10:00 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-21 22:10 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-22 3:30 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-22 6:13 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-22 7:14 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-22 7:33 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-25 18:26 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2022-07-26 13:55 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-07-27 11:28 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-27 13:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-07-27 15:09 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-27 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yt7gOhbqYzIKyhfv@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).