linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] cpufreq: ondemand: update update_sampling_rate() to make it more efficient
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:57:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a15399b18a06bbe3e22e9e7b01e8e4a7a61a044f.1446121217.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1446121217.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1446121217.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Currently update_sampling_rate() runs over each online CPU and
cancels/queues timers on all policy->cpus every time. This should be
done just once for any cpu belonging to a policy.

Create a cpumask and keep on clearing it as and when we process
policies, so that we don't have to traverse through all CPUs of the same
policy.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 9e0293c23285..6eac39124894 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared;
 	unsigned long next_sampling, appointed_at;
+	struct cpumask cpumask;
 	int cpu;
 
 	od_tuners->sampling_rate = new_rate = max(new_rate,
@@ -261,7 +262,9 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&od_dbs_cdata.mutex);
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+	cpumask_copy(&cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpumask) {
 		dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
 		cdbs = &dbs_info->cdbs;
 		shared = cdbs->shared;
@@ -275,6 +278,9 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
 
 		policy = shared->policy;
 
+		/* clear all CPUs of this policy */
+		cpumask_andnot(&cpumask, &cpumask, policy->cpus);
+
 		/*
 		 * Update sampling rate for CPUs whose policy is governed by
 		 * dbs_data. In case of governor_per_policy, only a single
@@ -284,6 +290,10 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
 		if (dbs_data != policy->governor_data)
 			continue;
 
+		/*
+		 * Checking this for any CPU should be fine, timers for all of
+		 * them are scheduled together.
+		 */
 		next_sampling = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate);
 		appointed_at = dbs_info->cdbs.timer.expires;
 
-- 
2.6.2.198.g614a2ac


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-29 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1446121217.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: ondemand: Update sampling rate only for concerned policies Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  2:16   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] cpufreq: ondemand: Work is guaranteed to be pending Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: governor: Pass policy as argument to ->gov_dbs_timer() Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: governor: initialize/destroy timer_mutex with 'shared' Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers Viresh Kumar
2015-10-30 20:46   ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-10-31  2:36     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-03 19:01       ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-11-30 12:05   ` Lucas Stach
2015-11-30 13:35     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-29 12:27 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a15399b18a06bbe3e22e9e7b01e8e4a7a61a044f.1446121217.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).