From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström (VMware)" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Zong Li" <zong.li@sifive.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Liang,
Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 11/25] mm: pagewalk: Add p4d_entry() and pgd_entry()
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:15:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5bb53f1-dd40-f32c-917b-a1ae1a49e5b2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fd20e9f-822a-897d-218e-bddf135fd33d@shipmail.org>
On 12/12/2019 11:33, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> On 12/12/19 12:23 PM, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
>> On 12/6/19 2:53 PM, Steven Price wrote:
>>> pgd_entry() and pud_entry() were removed by commit 0b1fbfe50006c410
>>> ("mm/pagewalk: remove pgd_entry() and pud_entry()") because there were
>>> no users. We're about to add users so reintroduce them, along with
>>> p4d_entry() as we now have 5 levels of tables.
>>>
>>> Note that commit a00cc7d9dd93d66a ("mm, x86: add support for
>>> PUD-sized transparent hugepages") already re-added pud_entry() but with
>>> different semantics to the other callbacks. Since there have never
>>> been upstream users of this, revert the semantics back to match the
>>> other callbacks. This means pud_entry() is called for all entries, not
>>> just transparent huge pages.
When I wrote that there were no upstream users, which sadly shows how
long ago that was :(
>> Actually, there are two users of pud_entry(), in hmm.c and since
>> 5.5rc1 also mapping_dirty_helpers.c. The latter one is unproblematic
>> and requires no attention but the one in hmm.c is probably largely
>> untested, and seems to assume it was called outside of the spinlock.
>>
>> The problem with the current patch is that the hmm pud_entry will
>> traverse also pmds, so that will be done twice now.
>>
>> In another thread we were discussing a means of rerunning the level
>> (in case of a race), or continuing after a level, based on the return
>> value after the callback. The change was fairly invasive,
>>
> Hmm. Forgot to remove the above text that appears twice. :(. The correct
> one is inline below.
>
>>
>>> Tested-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/pagewalk.h | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>> mm/pagewalk.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pagewalk.h b/include/linux/pagewalk.h
>>> index 6ec82e92c87f..06790f23957f 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/pagewalk.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/pagewalk.h
>>> @@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ struct mm_walk;
>>> /**
>>> * mm_walk_ops - callbacks for walk_page_range
>>> - * @pud_entry: if set, called for each non-empty PUD
>>> (2nd-level) entry
>>> - * this handler should only handle pud_trans_huge() puds.
>>> - * the pmd_entry or pte_entry callbacks will be used for
>>> - * regular PUDs.
>>> - * @pmd_entry: if set, called for each non-empty PMD
>>> (3rd-level) entry
>>> + * @pgd_entry: if set, called for each non-empty PGD
>>> (top-level) entry
>>> + * @p4d_entry: if set, called for each non-empty P4D entry
>>> + * @pud_entry: if set, called for each non-empty PUD entry
>>> + * @pmd_entry: if set, called for each non-empty PMD entry
>>> * this handler is required to be able to handle
>>> * pmd_trans_huge() pmds. They may simply choose to
>>> * split_huge_page() instead of handling it explicitly.
>>> - * @pte_entry: if set, called for each non-empty PTE
>>> (4th-level) entry
>>> + * @pte_entry: if set, called for each non-empty PTE
>>> (lowest-level)
>>> + * entry
>>> * @pte_hole: if set, called for each hole at all levels
>>> * @hugetlb_entry: if set, called for each hugetlb entry
>>> * @test_walk: caller specific callback function to
>>> determine whether
>>> @@ -27,8 +27,15 @@ struct mm_walk;
>>> * @pre_vma: if set, called before starting walk on a
>>> non-null vma.
>>> * @post_vma: if set, called after a walk on a non-null
>>> vma, provided
>>> * that @pre_vma and the vma walk succeeded.
>>> + *
>>> + * p?d_entry callbacks are called even if those levels are folded on a
>>> + * particular architecture/configuration.
>>> */
>>> struct mm_walk_ops {
>>> + int (*pgd_entry)(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr,
>>> + unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk);
>>> + int (*p4d_entry)(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr,
>>> + unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk);
>>> int (*pud_entry)(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
>>> unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk);
>>> int (*pmd_entry)(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>>> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
>>> index ea0b9e606ad1..c089786e7a7f 100644
>>> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
>>> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
>>> @@ -94,15 +94,9 @@ static int walk_pud_range(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned
>>> long addr, unsigned long end,
>>> }
>>> if (ops->pud_entry) {
>>> - spinlock_t *ptl = pud_trans_huge_lock(pud, walk->vma);
>>> -
>>> - if (ptl) {
>>> - err = ops->pud_entry(pud, addr, next, walk);
>>> - spin_unlock(ptl);
>>> - if (err)
>>> - break;
>>> - continue;
>>> - }
>>> + err = ops->pud_entry(pud, addr, next, walk);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + break;
>>
>> Actually, there are two current users of pud_entry(), in hmm.c and
>> since 5.5rc1 also mapping_dirty_helpers.c. The latter one is
>> unproblematic and requires no attention but the one in hmm.c is
>> probably largely untested, and seems to assume it was called outside
>> of the spinlock.
Thanks for pointing that out, I guess the simplest fix would be to
squash in something like the below which should restore the old
behaviour for hmm.c without affecting others.
Steve
---8<----
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index d379cb6496ae..744b6644d0e4 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -478,19 +478,26 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
pmd_t *pmdp;
pud_t pud;
int ret;
+ spinlock_t *ptl = pud_trans_huge_lock(pudp, walk->vma);
+ if (!ptl)
+ return 0;
again:
pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
- if (pud_none(pud))
- return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
+ if (pud_none(pud)) {
+ ret = hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
unsigned long i, npages, pfn;
uint64_t *pfns, cpu_flags;
bool fault, write_fault;
- if (!pud_present(pud))
- return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
+ if (!pud_present(pud)) {
+ ret = hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
i = (addr - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
npages = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -499,16 +506,20 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
cpu_flags = pud_to_hmm_pfn_flags(range, pud);
hmm_range_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, pfns, npages,
cpu_flags, &fault, &write_fault);
- if (fault || write_fault)
- return hmm_vma_walk_hole_(addr, end, fault,
- write_fault, walk);
+ if (fault || write_fault) {
+ ret = hmm_vma_walk_hole_(addr, end, fault,
+ write_fault, walk);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
pfn = pud_pfn(pud) + ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
for (i = 0; i < npages; ++i, ++pfn) {
hmm_vma_walk->pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn,
hmm_vma_walk->pgmap);
- if (unlikely(!hmm_vma_walk->pgmap))
- return -EBUSY;
+ if (unlikely(!hmm_vma_walk->pgmap)) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
pfns[i] = hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range, pfn) |
cpu_flags;
}
@@ -517,7 +528,8 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
hmm_vma_walk->pgmap = NULL;
}
hmm_vma_walk->last = end;
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
split_huge_pud(walk->vma, pudp, addr);
@@ -529,10 +541,14 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
ret = hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmdp, addr, next, walk);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto out_unlock;
} while (pmdp++, addr = next, addr != end);
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+
+out_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+ return ret;
}
#else
#define hmm_vma_walk_pud NULL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-12 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-06 13:52 [PATCH v16 00/25] Generic page walk and ptdump Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v16 01/25] mm: Add generic p?d_leaf() macros Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v16 02/25] arc: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v16 03/25] arm: " Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v16 04/25] arm64: " Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v16 05/25] mips: " Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v16 06/25] powerpc: " Steven Price
2019-12-09 11:08 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-12-09 13:06 ` Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v16 07/25] riscv: " Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v16 08/25] s390: " Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 09/25] sparc: " Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 10/25] x86: " Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 11/25] mm: pagewalk: Add p4d_entry() and pgd_entry() Steven Price
2019-12-12 11:23 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-12-12 11:33 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-12-12 13:15 ` Steven Price [this message]
2019-12-12 14:04 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-12-12 15:18 ` Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 12/25] mm: pagewalk: Allow walking without vma Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 13/25] mm: pagewalk: Don't lock PTEs for walk_page_range_novma() Steven Price
2019-12-10 11:23 ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-11 15:54 ` Steven Price
2019-12-11 17:12 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2019-12-11 17:19 ` Qian Cai
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 14/25] mm: pagewalk: fix termination condition in walk_pte_range() Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 15/25] mm: pagewalk: Add test_p?d callbacks Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 16/25] mm: pagewalk: Add 'depth' parameter to pte_hole Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 17/25] x86: mm: Point to struct seq_file from struct pg_state Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 18/25] x86: mm+efi: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level() to take a mm_struct Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 19/25] x86: mm: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level_debugfs() to take an mm_struct Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 20/25] x86: mm: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level_core() " Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 21/25] mm: Add generic ptdump Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 22/25] x86: mm: Convert dump_pagetables to use walk_page_range Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 23/25] arm64: mm: Convert mm/dump.c to use walk_page_range() Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 24/25] arm64: mm: Display non-present entries in ptdump Steven Price
2019-12-06 13:53 ` [PATCH v16 25/25] mm: ptdump: Reduce level numbers by 1 in note_page() Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5bb53f1-dd40-f32c-917b-a1ae1a49e5b2@arm.com \
--to=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas_os@shipmail.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).