From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vkuznets@redhat.com, wei.huang2@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Use a separate vmcb for the nested L2 guest
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:04:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6ed7866-69c3-ab5e-7219-d7c5075509db@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917192306.2080-1-cavery@redhat.com>
On 17/09/20 21:23, Cathy Avery wrote:
>
> 2) There is a workaround in nested_svm_vmexit() where
>
> if (svm->vmcb01->control.asid == 0)
> svm->vmcb01->control.asid = svm->nested.vmcb02->control.asid;
>
> This was done as a result of the kvm selftest 'state_test'. In that
> test svm_set_nested_state() is called before svm_vcpu_run().
> The asid is assigned by svm_vcpu_run -> pre_svm_run for the current
> vmcb which is now vmcb02 as we are in nested mode subsequently
> vmcb01.control.asid is never set as it should be.
I think the asid should be kept in svm->asid, and copied to
svm->vmcb->control.asid in svm_vcpu_run. It's slightly overkill for
non-nested but it simplifies the nested case a lot so it's worth it.
That would be a first patch in the series, placed before this one.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-17 19:23 [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Use a separate vmcb for the nested L2 guest Cathy Avery
2020-09-18 15:16 ` Babu Moger
2020-09-18 15:27 ` Cathy Avery
2020-09-18 16:46 ` Babu Moger
2020-09-18 21:11 ` Wei Huang
2020-09-21 14:07 ` Cathy Avery
2020-09-22 15:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-22 15:04 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-09-24 15:17 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-07 22:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-08 5:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-08 10:23 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-08 10:39 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-08 10:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-08 12:46 ` Cathy Avery
2020-10-08 13:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-08 13:52 ` Cathy Avery
2020-10-08 14:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-09 12:31 ` Cathy Avery
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6ed7866-69c3-ab5e-7219-d7c5075509db@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).