From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057F8C07E99 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 09:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A96613D6 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 09:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231804AbhGIJNh (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 05:13:37 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([185.132.182.106]:36122 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229559AbhGIJNg (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 05:13:36 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0241204.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 169918gk031664; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:09:51 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h=subject : to : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=DVH6ZuxNXZTaEp6S+cHLNHrvmkcMuKnL6vylu2Kte94=; b=7X5msmvjOn6lK1uy7Ov8hNhhBoUX+ReOVaZHIli8xgs4URQqfsV9h2q3EJXf0IyZyrk6 7ruDFLQaiTTrqQkNVRP1+z7Rv3updQNngansGwJLOY/0Yix0aqY6xoBjAXTZsih9S+kd poVuB4Kx/1KZe0q+NYpzxtuSki2I6bjBhUKmA8xen5CKzs0uCxzrEN5X83BpPYUhxmC3 +IzXYipnYgtWR+uKtzKR6JP1KdrOrsfZ3uUxa0CnDt320w51GFLgppGJ8WLDLqv86vTj HJaalJUplp1g4iT0HZswmfKbe78By3wzgNH0Gryn8cbYrDtO03w7qs/UDlKBYJvXTfkF 8A== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 39p4vbbww3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 11:09:51 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id A91B010002A; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:09:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag2node3.st.com [10.75.127.6]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 87CAF218CB8; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:09:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmecxl0557.lme.st.com (10.75.127.47) by SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:09:47 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add "BACKGROUND_COLOR" drm property To: Simon Ser , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Yannick FERTRE - foss , Philippe CORNU - foss , Benjamin Gaignard , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre TORGUE - foss , Matt Roper , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Yannick FERTRE , Raphael GALLAIS-POU , Philippe CORNU References: <20210707084557.22443-1-raphael.gallais-pou@foss.st.com> <31K3xupK1-7HNWorHqIwGwgEJl-1XdFjUQEoNYm6yB-lRoZ8kq5quRji_r3mzPZ0bUayLef6xPfQDiETgZp9lR7vUpDn2nB_37ncSd-J0Wc=@emersion.fr> From: Raphael Gallais-Pou Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:09:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.47] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG2NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.5) To SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-09_04:2021-07-09,2021-07-09 signatures=0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/7/21 1:42 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 09:03:03AM +0000, Simon Ser wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for working on this. Do you have plans for user-space >> implementations and IGT? > Note that these parts are mandatory, and there's a patch floating around > further clarifying what's all expected for new properties: > > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210706161244.1038592-1-maxime@cerno.tech/ Hi, We don't usually test with piglit and igt-gpu-tools. Instead, modetest utility of the libdrm is used quite often (as is it the case in order to test this property). We plan to port those tools on our platform before implementing this kind of tests, but it will require a bit more time. An analysis is currently ongoing. Furthermore, do you have any advice on top of documentation for implementing such tests ? I was also thinking about implementing an option into modetest to ease the use of this drm property (support of hexadecimal values for properties). Regards, Raphaël > > Cheers, Daniel > >> Thanks, >> >> Simon