From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
tj@kernel.org, Metathronius Galabant <m.galabant@googlemail.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Adrian Drzewiecki <z@drze.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [slub p4 0/7] slub: per cpu partial lists V4
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:29:42 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108150928200.24941@router.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108131118001.32762@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, David Rientjes wrote:
> I'm currently 35,000 feet above Chicago going about 611 mph, so what
> better time to benchmark this patchset on my netperf testing rack!
>
> threads before after
> 16 78031 74714 (-4.3%)
> 32 118269 115810 (-2.1%)
> 48 150787 150165 (-0.4%)
> 64 189932 187766 (-1.1%)
> 80 221189 223682 (+1.1%)
> 96 239807 246222 (+2.7%)
> 112 262135 271329 (+3.5%)
> 128 273612 286782 (+4.8%)
> 144 280009 293943 (+5.0%)
> 160 285972 299798 (+4.8%)
The higher the contention the better the performance. But the -4% on non
contention is worrisome.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-09 21:12 [slub p4 0/7] slub: per cpu partial lists V4 Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 1/7] slub: free slabs without holding locks (V2) Christoph Lameter
2011-08-20 10:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-20 15:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 2/7] slub: Remove useless statements in __slab_alloc Christoph Lameter
2011-08-20 10:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-20 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 3/7] slub: Prepare inuse field in new_slab() Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 4/7] slub: pass kmem_cache_cpu pointer to get_partial() Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 5/7] slub: return object pointer from get_partial() / new_slab() Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 6/7] slub: per cpu cache for partial pages Christoph Lameter
2011-08-20 10:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-20 16:00 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <CAF1ivSaH9fh6_QvuBkLc5t=zC4mPEAD5ZzsxOuPruDwG9MiZzw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-24 7:26 ` Lin Ming
2011-08-24 13:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 7/7] slub: update slabinfo tools to report per cpu partial list statistics Christoph Lameter
2011-08-13 18:28 ` [slub p4 0/7] slub: per cpu partial lists V4 David Rientjes
2011-08-15 8:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-15 14:29 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2011-08-20 10:48 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1108150928200.24941@router.home \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.galabant@googlemail.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=z@drze.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).