linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, slab: faster active and free stats
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:56:44 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611291655580.135607@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161128074001.GA32105@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Sorry for long delay.
> I agree that this improvement is needed. Could you try the approach
> that maintains n->num_slabs and n->free_slabs? I guess that it would be
> simpler than this patch so more maintainable.
> 

Ok, what do you think about the following?  I'm not sure it's that much 
more simpler.


mm, slab: track total number of slabs instead of active slabs

Rather than tracking the number of active slabs for each node, track the
total number of slabs.  This is a minor improvement that avoids active
slab tracking when a slab goes from free to partial or partial to free.

Suggested-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
 mm/slab.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 mm/slab.h |  4 ++--
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void kmem_cache_node_init(struct kmem_cache_node *parent)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&parent->slabs_full);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&parent->slabs_partial);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&parent->slabs_free);
-	parent->active_slabs = 0;
+	parent->total_slabs = 0;
 	parent->free_slabs = 0;
 	parent->shared = NULL;
 	parent->alien = NULL;
@@ -1381,20 +1381,18 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfpflags, int nodeid)
 		cachep->name, cachep->size, cachep->gfporder);
 
 	for_each_kmem_cache_node(cachep, node, n) {
-		unsigned long active_objs = 0, free_objs = 0;
-		unsigned long active_slabs, num_slabs;
+		unsigned long total_slabs, free_slabs, free_objs;
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
-		active_slabs = n->active_slabs;
-		num_slabs = active_slabs + n->free_slabs;
-
-		active_objs += (num_slabs * cachep->num) - n->free_objects;
-		free_objs += n->free_objects;
+		total_slabs = n->total_slabs;
+		free_slabs = n->free_slabs;
+		free_objs = n->free_objects;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
 
-		pr_warn("  node %d: slabs: %ld/%ld, objs: %ld/%ld, free: %ld\n",
-			node, active_slabs, num_slabs, active_objs,
-			num_slabs * cachep->num, free_objs);
+		pr_warn("  node %d: slabs: %ld/%ld, objs: %ld/%ld\n",
+			node, total_slabs - free_slabs, total_slabs,
+			(total_slabs * cachep->num) - free_objs,
+			total_slabs * cachep->num);
 	}
 #endif
 }
@@ -2307,6 +2305,7 @@ static int drain_freelist(struct kmem_cache *cache,
 		page = list_entry(p, struct page, lru);
 		list_del(&page->lru);
 		n->free_slabs--;
+		n->total_slabs--;
 		/*
 		 * Safe to drop the lock. The slab is no longer linked
 		 * to the cache.
@@ -2741,13 +2740,12 @@ static void cache_grow_end(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct page *page)
 	n = get_node(cachep, page_to_nid(page));
 
 	spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
+	n->total_slabs++;
 	if (!page->active) {
 		list_add_tail(&page->lru, &(n->slabs_free));
 		n->free_slabs++;
-	} else {
+	} else
 		fixup_slab_list(cachep, n, page, &list);
-		n->active_slabs++;
-	}
 
 	STATS_INC_GROWN(cachep);
 	n->free_objects += cachep->num - page->active;
@@ -2935,10 +2933,8 @@ static struct page *get_first_slab(struct kmem_cache_node *n, bool pfmemalloc)
 	if (sk_memalloc_socks())
 		page = get_valid_first_slab(n, page, &page_is_free, pfmemalloc);
 
-	if (page && page_is_free) {
-		n->active_slabs++;
+	if (page && page_is_free)
 		n->free_slabs--;
-	}
 
 	return page;
 }
@@ -3441,7 +3437,6 @@ static void free_block(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void **objpp,
 		if (page->active == 0) {
 			list_add(&page->lru, &n->slabs_free);
 			n->free_slabs++;
-			n->active_slabs--;
 		} else {
 			/* Unconditionally move a slab to the end of the
 			 * partial list on free - maximum time for the
@@ -3457,6 +3452,7 @@ static void free_block(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void **objpp,
 		page = list_last_entry(&n->slabs_free, struct page, lru);
 		list_move(&page->lru, list);
 		n->free_slabs--;
+		n->total_slabs--;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4109,8 +4105,8 @@ static void cache_reap(struct work_struct *w)
 void get_slabinfo(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct slabinfo *sinfo)
 {
 	unsigned long active_objs, num_objs, active_slabs;
-	unsigned long num_slabs = 0, free_objs = 0, shared_avail = 0;
-	unsigned long num_slabs_free = 0;
+	unsigned long total_slabs = 0, free_objs = 0, shared_avail = 0;
+	unsigned long free_slabs = 0;
 	int node;
 	struct kmem_cache_node *n;
 
@@ -4118,9 +4114,8 @@ void get_slabinfo(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct slabinfo *sinfo)
 		check_irq_on();
 		spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
 
-		num_slabs += n->active_slabs + n->free_slabs;
-		num_slabs_free += n->free_slabs;
-
+		total_slabs += n->total_slabs;
+		free_slabs += n->free_slabs;
 		free_objs += n->free_objects;
 
 		if (n->shared)
@@ -4128,15 +4123,14 @@ void get_slabinfo(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct slabinfo *sinfo)
 
 		spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
 	}
-	num_objs = num_slabs * cachep->num;
-	active_slabs = num_slabs - num_slabs_free;
-
+	num_objs = total_slabs * cachep->num;
+	active_slabs = total_slabs - free_slabs;
 	active_objs = num_objs - free_objs;
 
 	sinfo->active_objs = active_objs;
 	sinfo->num_objs = num_objs;
 	sinfo->active_slabs = active_slabs;
-	sinfo->num_slabs = num_slabs;
+	sinfo->num_slabs = total_slabs;
 	sinfo->shared_avail = shared_avail;
 	sinfo->limit = cachep->limit;
 	sinfo->batchcount = cachep->batchcount;
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ struct kmem_cache_node {
 	struct list_head slabs_partial;	/* partial list first, better asm code */
 	struct list_head slabs_full;
 	struct list_head slabs_free;
-	unsigned long active_slabs;	/* length of slabs_partial+slabs_full */
-	unsigned long free_slabs;	/* length of slabs_free */
+	unsigned long total_slabs;	/* length of all slab lists */
+	unsigned long free_slabs;	/* length of free slab list only */
 	unsigned long free_objects;
 	unsigned int free_limit;
 	unsigned int colour_next;	/* Per-node cache coloring */

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-30  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08 23:06 [patch] mm, slab: faster active and free stats David Rientjes
2016-11-08 23:17 ` Andrew Morton
2016-11-10  0:38   ` David Rientjes
2016-11-11  5:53     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-11-11 10:30       ` David Rientjes
2016-11-28  7:40         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-11-30  0:56           ` David Rientjes [this message]
2016-12-02  7:58             ` 김준수/선임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com)
2016-12-05  4:23               ` [patch -mm] mm, slab: maintain total slab count instead of active count David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1611291655580.135607@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).