linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using kmalloc
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:57:42 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610261650260.4983@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161026141359.GA6893@redhat.com>

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Some notes right now. Of course, with this patch we are ready to remove
> put_task_stack() from kthread.c right now. The next change should kill
> to_live_kthread() altogether. And stop using ->vfork_done.
> 
> And. With this patch we do not need another "workqueue: ignore dead tasks
> in a workqueue sleep hook" fix from Roman.

Nice !
 
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index be2cc1f..c6adbde 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -53,14 +53,34 @@ enum KTHREAD_BITS {
>  	KTHREAD_IS_PARKED,
>  };
>  
> -#define __to_kthread(vfork)	\
> -	container_of(vfork, struct kthread, exited)
> +static inline void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * We abuse ->set_child_tid to avoid the new member and because it
> +	 * can't be wrongly copied by copy_process(). We also rely on fact
> +	 * that the caller can't exec, so PF_KTHREAD can't be cleared.
> +	 */
> +	current->set_child_tid = (__force void __user *)kthread;

Can we pretty please avoid this type casting? We only have 5 places using
set_child_tid. So we can really make it a proper union and fix up the 5
usage sites as a preparatory patch for this.

> +}
>  
>  static inline struct kthread *to_kthread(struct task_struct *k)
>  {
> -	return __to_kthread(k->vfork_done);
> +	WARN_ON(!(k->flags & PF_KTHREAD));
> +	return (__force void *)k->set_child_tid;
>  }
>  
> +void free_kthread_struct(struct task_struct *k)
> +{
> +	kfree(to_kthread(k)); /* can be NULL if kmalloc() failed */

Can you please not use tail comments? They really stop the reading flow.

> +#define __to_kthread(vfork)	\
> +	container_of(vfork, struct kthread, exited)
> +
> +/*
> + * TODO: kill it and use to_kthread(). But we still need the users
> + * like kthread_stop() which has to sync with the exiting kthread.
> + */
>  static struct kthread *to_live_kthread(struct task_struct *k)
>  {
>  	struct completion *vfork = ACCESS_ONCE(k->vfork_done);
> @@ -181,14 +201,11 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
>  	int (*threadfn)(void *data) = create->threadfn;
>  	void *data = create->data;
>  	struct completion *done;
> -	struct kthread self;
> +	struct kthread *self;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	self.flags = 0;
> -	self.data = data;
> -	init_completion(&self.exited);
> -	init_completion(&self.parked);
> -	current->vfork_done = &self.exited;
> +	self = kmalloc(sizeof(*self), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	set_kthread_struct(self);
>  
>  	/* If user was SIGKILLed, I release the structure. */
>  	done = xchg(&create->done, NULL);
> @@ -196,6 +213,19 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
>  		kfree(create);
>  		do_exit(-EINTR);
>  	}
> +
> +	if (!self) {
> +		create->result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +		complete(done);
> +		do_exit(-ENOMEM);
> +	}
> +
> +	self->flags = 0;
> +	self->data = data;
> +	init_completion(&self->exited);
> +	init_completion(&self->parked);
> +	current->vfork_done = &self->exited;
> +
>  	/* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
>  	__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>  	create->result = current;
> @@ -203,12 +233,10 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
>  	schedule();
>  
>  	ret = -EINTR;
> -
> -	if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self.flags)) {
> -		__kthread_parkme(&self);
> +	if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self->flags)) {
> +		__kthread_parkme(self);
>  		ret = threadfn(data);
>  	}
> -	/* we can't just return, we must preserve "self" on stack */
>  	do_exit(ret);
>  }

Other than the above nits, this is the right direction to go.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-26 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-25 11:05 [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using kmalloc Roman Pen
2016-10-25 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-25 15:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-25 16:08     ` Roman Penyaev
2016-10-25 16:17       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-25 16:52     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-26 14:14       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-26 14:57         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-10-26 15:51           ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-26 18:31             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-28 16:11               ` [PATCH 0/2] kthread: make struct kthread kmalloc'ed Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-28 16:11                 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-28 18:48                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-28 16:12                 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "kthread: Pin the stack via try_get_task_stack()/put_task_stack() in to_live_kthread() function" Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-28 18:49                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-28 18:44                 ` [PATCH 0/2] kthread: make struct kthread kmalloc'ed Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-31 20:07                 ` [PATCH 0/2] kthread: kill to_live_kthread() Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-31 20:07                   ` [PATCH 1/2] kthread: don't use to_live_kthread() in kthread_stop() Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-09  7:58                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-31 20:08                   ` [PATCH 2/2] kthread: don't use to_live_kthread() in kthread_park() and kthread_unpark() Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-09  8:45                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-09 17:27                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-10 17:19                         ` [PATCH 0/1] kthread: don't abuse kthread_create_on_cpu() in __kthread_create_worker() Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-10 17:20                           ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-14 11:12                             ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-14 11:09                           ` [PATCH 0/1] " Petr Mladek
2016-11-07 18:23                   ` [PATCH 0/2] kthread: kill to_live_kthread() Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-26 16:13         ` [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using kmalloc Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-27  2:56         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-27 13:10           ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-25 15:46   ` Roman Penyaev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1610261650260.4983@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).