From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ioremap: tighten integer overflow checking
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:34:58 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810291925470.5984@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181025061633.t32bxslxj3h7jv2x@kili.mountain>
Dan,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The current check is a bit off in the case where "phys_addr + size"
> wraps to zero because then "last_addr" is set to ULONG_MAX which is >=
> phys_addr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> index 5378d10f1d31..ee43df3ebe66 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
> void __iomem *ret_addr;
>
> /* Don't allow wraparound or zero size */
> - last_addr = phys_addr + size - 1;
> - if (!size || last_addr < phys_addr)
> + if (!size || phys_addr + size < phys_addr)
Assume the following (resource_size_t == u32, which is the case when
CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n):
phys_addr = 0xFFFF0000
size = 0x00010000
sum = 0x00000000 which is < phys_addr
But the existing code does:
last_addr = phys_addr + size - 1
= 0xFFFFFFFF
which is correct. last_addr is the last valid address in the to be remapped
range starting @phys_addr.
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-29 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-25 6:16 [PATCH] x86/ioremap: tighten integer overflow checking Dan Carpenter
2018-10-25 6:28 ` Juergen Gross
2018-10-25 7:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-10-29 18:34 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1810291925470.5984@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).