From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010BCC48BD6 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14572085A for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726439AbfFZUfI (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:35:08 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:50304 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726223AbfFZUfI (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:35:08 -0400 Received: from p5b06daab.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.171] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hgEd3-0006Ow-24; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:34:53 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:34:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Fenghua Yu cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Radim Krcmar , Christopherson Sean J , Ashok Raj , Tony Luck , Dan Williams , Xiaoyao Li , Sai Praneeth Prakhya , Ravi V Shankar , linux-kernel , x86 , kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 13/17] x86/split_lock: Disable split lock detection by kernel parameter "nosplit_lock_detect" In-Reply-To: <1560897679-228028-14-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> Message-ID: References: <1560897679-228028-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <1560897679-228028-14-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Fenghua Yu wrote: > > static void split_lock_update_msr(void) > { > - /* Enable split lock detection */ > - this_cpu_or(msr_test_ctl_cached, MSR_TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT); > + if (split_lock_detect_enabled) { > + /* Enable split lock detection */ > + this_cpu_or(msr_test_ctl_cached, MSR_TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT); > + } else { > + /* Disable split lock detection */ Could you please comment the non obvious things and not the obvious ones? > + this_cpu_and(msr_test_ctl_cached, ~MSR_TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT); It's entirely clear that the if (enabled) path enables it or am I missing something? Thanks, tglx