linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for local TLB flushes
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:30:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c15cc44b20e23c50fe7fdcf89ca0b8aea151275e.1495492063.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1495492063.git.luto@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1495492063.git.luto@kernel.org>

On a remote TLB flush, we leave_mm() if we're TLBSTATE_LAZY.  For a
local flush_tlb_mm_range(), we leave_mm() if !current->mm.  These
are approximately the same condition -- the scheduler sets lazy TLB
mode when switching to a thread with no mm.

I'm about to merge the local and remote flush code, but for ease of
verifying and bisecting the patch, I want the local and remote flush
behavior to match first.  This patch changes the local code to match
the remote code.

Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 776469cc54e0..3143c9a180e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (!current->mm) {
+	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.state) != TLBSTATE_OK) {
 		leave_mm(smp_processor_id());
 
 		/* Synchronize with switch_mm. */
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-22 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-22 22:30 [PATCH v2 00/11] x86 TLB flush cleanups, moving toward PCID support Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] x86/mm: Reimplement flush_tlb_page() using flush_tlb_mm_range() Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-24 10:21   ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] x86/mm: Reduce indentation in flush_tlb_func() Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-24 10:22   ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] x86/mm: Make the batched unmap TLB flush API more generic Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-24 10:22   ` [tip:x86/mm] mm, " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] x86/mm: Pass flush_tlb_info to flush_tlb_others() etc Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-24  8:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-05-22 22:30 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/mm: Refactor flush_tlb_mm_range() to merge local and remote cases Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/mm: Use new merged flush logic in arch_tlbbatch_flush() Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/mm: Remove the UP tlbflush code; always use the formerly SMP code Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/mm: Be more consistent wrt PAGE_SHIFT vs PAGE_SIZE in tlb flush code Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 23:24   ` Nadav Amit
2017-05-22 23:41     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] x86,kvm: Teach KVM's VMX code that CR3 isn't a constant Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c15cc44b20e23c50fe7fdcf89ca0b8aea151275e.1495492063.git.luto@kernel.org \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).