From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <christian.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?"
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:07:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c351bf0c-0139-81e1-e053-c07cb76f1421@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5762559A.1090604@de.ibm.com>
On 16/06/2016 09:30, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 12:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>>> arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 1 -
>>>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++--------
>>>>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------
>>>>> virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 ---
>>>>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>> Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :)
>>
>> So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next?
>
>
> With the 2 fixes that Conny requested, yes.
>
> With that fixed up,
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Yes, of course. Pushed, thanks!
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-16 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-13 13:25 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-13 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: introduce kvm->created_vcpus Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-13 14:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2016-06-13 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: remove kvm_vcpu_compatible Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-13 13:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: use kvm->created_vcpus Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-13 14:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2016-06-13 13:33 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Christian Borntraeger
2016-06-13 14:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2016-06-15 22:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16 7:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-06-16 7:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2016-06-16 8:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16 8:07 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c351bf0c-0139-81e1-e053-c07cb76f1421@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=christian.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).