From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Deactivate APICv only when AutoEOI feature is in use
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 15:13:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c51d3f0b46bb3f73d82d66fae92425be76b84a68.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713142023.106183-9-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 17:20 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>
> APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_HYPERV is currently unconditionally forced upon
> SynIC activation as SynIC's AutoEOI is incompatible with APICv/AVIC. It is,
> however, possible to track whether the feature was actually used by the
> guest and only inhibit APICv/AVIC when needed.
>
> TLFS suggests a dedicated 'HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED' flag to let
> Windows know that AutoEOI feature should be avoided. While it's up to
> KVM userspace to set the flag, KVM can help a bit by exposing global
> APICv/AVIC enablement: in case APICv/AVIC usage is impossible, AutoEOI
> is still preferred.
>
> Maxim:
> - added SRCU lock drop around call to kvm_request_apicv_update
> - always set HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED in kvm_get_hv_cpuid,
> since this feature can be used regardless of AVIC
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index e11d64aa0bcd..f900dca58af8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -956,6 +956,9 @@ struct kvm_hv {
> /* How many vCPUs have VP index != vCPU index */
> atomic_t num_mismatched_vp_indexes;
>
> + /* How many SynICs use 'AutoEOI' feature */
> + atomic_t synic_auto_eoi_used;
> +
> struct hv_partition_assist_pg *hv_pa_pg;
> struct kvm_hv_syndbg hv_syndbg;
> };
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index b07592ca92f0..6bf47a583d0e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,22 @@ static bool synic_has_vector_auto_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic,
> return false;
> }
>
> +
> +static void synic_toggle_avic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool activate)
> +{
> + srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> + kvm_request_apicv_update(vcpu->kvm, activate,
> + APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_HYPERV);
> + vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> +}
Well turns out that this patch still doesn't work (on this
weekend I found out that all my AVIC enabled VMs hang on reboot).
I finally found out what prompted me back then to make srcu lock drop
in synic_update_vector conditional on whether the write was done
by the host.
Turns out that while KVM_SET_MSRS does take the kvm->srcu lock,
it stores the returned srcu index in a local variable and not
in vcpu->srcu_idx, thus the lock drop in synic_toggle_avic
doesn't work.
So it is likely that I have seen it not work, and blamed
KVM_SET_MSRS for not taking the srcu lock which was a wrong assumption.
I am more inclined to fix this by just tracking if we hold the srcu
lock on each VCPU manually, just as we track the srcu index anyway,
and then kvm_request_apicv_update can use this to drop the srcu
lock when needed.
> +
> static void synic_update_vector(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic,
> int vector)
> {
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = hv_synic_to_vcpu(synic);
> + struct kvm_hv *hv = to_kvm_hv(vcpu->kvm);
> + int auto_eoi_old, auto_eoi_new;
> +
> if (vector < HV_SYNIC_FIRST_VALID_VECTOR)
> return;
>
> @@ -96,10 +109,23 @@ static void synic_update_vector(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic,
> else
> __clear_bit(vector, synic->vec_bitmap);
>
> + auto_eoi_old = bitmap_weight(synic->auto_eoi_bitmap, 256);
> +
> if (synic_has_vector_auto_eoi(synic, vector))
> __set_bit(vector, synic->auto_eoi_bitmap);
> else
> __clear_bit(vector, synic->auto_eoi_bitmap);
> +
> + auto_eoi_new = bitmap_weight(synic->auto_eoi_bitmap, 256);
> +
> + /* Hyper-V SynIC auto EOI SINTs are not compatible with APICV */
> + if (!auto_eoi_old && auto_eoi_new) {
> + if (atomic_inc_return(&hv->synic_auto_eoi_used) == 1)
> + synic_toggle_avic(vcpu, false);
> + } else if (!auto_eoi_new && auto_eoi_old) {
> + if (atomic_dec_return(&hv->synic_auto_eoi_used) == 0)
> + synic_toggle_avic(vcpu, true);
> + }
> }
>
> static int synic_set_sint(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic, int sint,
> @@ -933,12 +959,6 @@ int kvm_hv_activate_synic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool dont_zero_synic_pages)
>
> synic = to_hv_synic(vcpu);
>
> - /*
> - * Hyper-V SynIC auto EOI SINT's are
> - * not compatible with APICV, so request
> - * to deactivate APICV permanently.
> - */
> - kvm_request_apicv_update(vcpu->kvm, false, APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_HYPERV);
> synic->active = true;
> synic->dont_zero_synic_pages = dont_zero_synic_pages;
> synic->control = HV_SYNIC_CONTROL_ENABLE;
> @@ -2466,6 +2486,8 @@ int kvm_get_hv_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
> ent->eax |= HV_X64_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS_RECOMMENDED;
> if (!cpu_smt_possible())
> ent->eax |= HV_X64_NO_NONARCH_CORESHARING;
> +
> + ent->eax |= HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED;
Vitally, I would like to hear your opinion on this change I also made to your code.
I think that we should always expose HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED as a supported
HV cpuid bit regardless of AVIC, so that qemu could set it regardless of AVIC
in the kernel, even if this is not optimal.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
> /*
> * Default number of spinlock retry attempts, matches
> * HyperV 2016.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-18 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 14:20 [PATCH v2 0/8] My AVIC patch queue Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-13 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] KVM: SVM: svm_set_vintr don't warn if AVIC is active but is about to be deactivated Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-13 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: SVM: tweak warning about enabled AVIC on nested entry Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-13 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] KVM: SVM: use vmcb01 in svm_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-13 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: x86: APICv: drop immediate APICv disablement on current vCPU Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-13 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: x86: APICv: fix race in kvm_request_apicv_update on SVM Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-26 22:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-27 13:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-13 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: SVM: add warning for mistmatch between AVIC state and AVIC access page state Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-13 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: SVM: call avic_vcpu_load/avic_vcpu_put when enabling/disabling AVIC Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-13 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Deactivate APICv only when AutoEOI feature is in use Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-18 12:13 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-07-19 7:47 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-07-19 9:00 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-19 9:23 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-07-19 9:58 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-19 18:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 9:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-22 9:12 ` KVM's support for non default APIC base Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-02 9:20 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-06 21:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-09 9:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-09 15:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-09 16:47 ` Jim Mattson
2021-08-10 20:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-22 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Deactivate APICv only when AutoEOI feature is in use Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-22 19:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-27 13:05 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-27 17:48 ` Ben Gardon
2021-07-27 18:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-29 14:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-26 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] My AVIC patch queue Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c51d3f0b46bb3f73d82d66fae92425be76b84a68.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).