linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to avoid touching checkpointed data in get_victim()
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:04:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c83a46b3-de4b-5ba0-2cb4-162a349907aa@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHUJFElliMOWMbWN@google.com>

On 2021/4/13 10:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/11, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> Could you please help to merge below cleanup diff into original patch?
>> or merge this separately if it is too late since it is near rc7.
> 
> I didn't review this tho, this gives an error in xfstests/083.

My bad, I hit this issue too, let me check this.

Thanks,

> 
>>
>>  From 5a342a8f332a1b3281ec0e2b4d41b5287689c8ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:29:34 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid duplicated codes for cleanup
>>
>> f2fs_segment_has_free_slot() was copied from __next_free_blkoff(),
>> the main implementation of them is almost the same, clean up them to
>> reuse common code as much as possible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/f2fs/segment.c | 32 ++++++++++----------------------
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index b33273aa5c22..bd9056165d62 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -2627,22 +2627,20 @@ static void new_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type, bool new_sec)
>>   	curseg->alloc_type = LFS;
>>   }
>>
>> -static void __next_free_blkoff(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> -			struct curseg_info *seg, block_t start)
>> +static int __next_free_blkoff(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> +					int segno, block_t start)
>>   {
>> -	struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, seg->segno);
>> +	struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
>>   	int entries = SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long);
>>   	unsigned long *target_map = SIT_I(sbi)->tmp_map;
>>   	unsigned long *ckpt_map = (unsigned long *)se->ckpt_valid_map;
>>   	unsigned long *cur_map = (unsigned long *)se->cur_valid_map;
>> -	int i, pos;
>> +	int i;
>>
>>   	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++)
>>   		target_map[i] = ckpt_map[i] | cur_map[i];
>>
>> -	pos = __find_rev_next_zero_bit(target_map, sbi->blocks_per_seg, start);
>> -
>> -	seg->next_blkoff = pos;
>> +	return __find_rev_next_zero_bit(target_map, sbi->blocks_per_seg, start);
>>   }
>>
>>   /*
>> @@ -2654,26 +2652,16 @@ static void __refresh_next_blkoff(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>   				struct curseg_info *seg)
>>   {
>>   	if (seg->alloc_type == SSR)
>> -		__next_free_blkoff(sbi, seg, seg->next_blkoff + 1);
>> +		seg->next_blkoff =
>> +			__next_free_blkoff(sbi, seg->segno,
>> +						seg->next_blkoff + 1);
>>   	else
>>   		seg->next_blkoff++;
>>   }
>>
>>   bool f2fs_segment_has_free_slot(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int segno)
>>   {
>> -	struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
>> -	int entries = SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long);
>> -	unsigned long *target_map = SIT_I(sbi)->tmp_map;
>> -	unsigned long *ckpt_map = (unsigned long *)se->ckpt_valid_map;
>> -	unsigned long *cur_map = (unsigned long *)se->cur_valid_map;
>> -	int i, pos;
>> -
>> -	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++)
>> -		target_map[i] = ckpt_map[i] | cur_map[i];
>> -
>> -	pos = __find_rev_next_zero_bit(target_map, sbi->blocks_per_seg, 0);
>> -
>> -	return pos < sbi->blocks_per_seg;
>> +	return __next_free_blkoff(sbi, segno, 0) < sbi->blocks_per_seg;
>>   }
>>
>>   /*
>> @@ -2701,7 +2689,7 @@ static void change_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type, bool flush)
>>
>>   	reset_curseg(sbi, type, 1);
>>   	curseg->alloc_type = SSR;
>> -	__next_free_blkoff(sbi, curseg, 0);
>> +	__next_free_blkoff(sbi, curseg->segno, 0);
>>
>>   	sum_page = f2fs_get_sum_page(sbi, new_segno);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(sum_page)) {
>> -- 
>> 2.22.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-13  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24  3:18 [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to avoid touching checkpointed data in get_victim() Chao Yu
2021-03-24 23:49 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-03-25  1:30   ` Chao Yu
2021-03-25  1:51     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-03-26  7:33   ` Chao Yu
2021-04-11  7:01     ` Chao Yu
2021-04-13  2:59       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-04-13  3:04         ` Chao Yu [this message]
2021-04-13  3:23         ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2021-04-13  9:56         ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c83a46b3-de4b-5ba0-2cb4-162a349907aa@huawei.com \
    --to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).