linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: On emulation failure, convey the exit reason to userspace
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:48:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cunmtq5temh.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOjGdFXXCqDeVlh4@google.com>

On Friday, 2021-07-09 at 21:58:12 GMT, Sean Christopherson wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 02, 2021, David Edmondson wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 2021-06-30 at 16:48:42 UTC, David Matlack wrote:
>> 
>> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 06:31:52PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>> >>  	if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu) && static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(vcpu) == 0) {
>> >> -		vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> >> -		vcpu->run->internal.suberror = KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION;
>> >> -		vcpu->run->internal.ndata = 0;
>> >> +		prepare_emulation_failure_exit(
>> >> +			vcpu, KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_EXIT_REASON);
>> >
>> > Should kvm_task_switch and kvm_handle_memory_failure also be updated
>> > like this?
>> 
>> Will do in v2.
>> 
>> sgx_handle_emulation_failure() seems like an existing user of
>> KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION that doesn't follow the new protocol (use
>> the emulation_failure part of the union).
>> 
>> Sean: If I add another flag for this case, what is the existing
>> user-level consumer?
>
> Doh, the SGX case should have been updated as part of commit c88339d88b0a ("kvm:
> x86: Allow userspace to handle emulation errors").  The easiest fix for SGX would
> be to zero out 'flags', bump ndata, and shift the existing field usage.  That
> would resolve the existing problem of the address being misinterpreted as flags,
> and would play nice _if_ additional flags are added.  I'll send a patch for that.
>
> [...]
>
> Which brings me back to adding another flag when dumping the exit reason.  Unless
> there is a concrete use case for programmatically taking action in reponse to
> failed emulation, e.g. attemping emulation in userspace using insn_bytes+insn_size,
> I think we should not add a flag and instead dump info for debug/triage purposes
> without committing to an ABI.  I.e. define the ABI such that KVM can dump
> arbitrary info in the unused portions of data[].

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210729133931.1129696-1-david.edmondson@oracle.com
includes both of these suggestions.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-29 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-28 17:31 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Convey the exit reason to user-space on emulation failure David Edmondson
2021-06-28 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Add kvm_x86_ops.get_exit_reason David Edmondson
2021-06-30 16:36   ` David Matlack
2021-06-28 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: On emulation failure, convey the exit reason to userspace David Edmondson
2021-06-30 16:48   ` David Matlack
2021-07-02  8:44     ` David Edmondson
2021-07-09 21:58       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-29 13:48         ` David Edmondson [this message]
2021-06-30 16:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Convey the exit reason to user-space on emulation failure David Matlack
2021-06-30 17:08   ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cunmtq5temh.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).