From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add AOSS QMP node
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:28:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d19fbcc91b4ef045014b225e7fdf9780@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cf5692ef7d348ec361081d0341f1254@codeaurora.org>
On 2021-02-27 19:26, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> On 2021-02-27 00:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 23:51:00)
>>> On 2021-02-26 01:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:24)
>>> >> Add a DT node for the AOSS QMP on SC7280 SoC.
>>> >>
>>> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
>>> >> ---
>>> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>> >>
>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> >> index 65c1e0f2fb56..cbd567ccc04e 100644
>>> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>> >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>> >> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
>>> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>> >> #include <dt-bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.h>
>>> >> +#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-aoss-qmp.h>
>>> >> #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
>>> >>
>>> >> / {
>>> >> @@ -368,6 +369,19 @@ pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
>>> >> interrupt-controller;
>>> >> };
>>> >>
>>> >> + aoss_qmp: qmp@c300000 {
>>> >
>>> > power-domain-controller@c300000? power-controller@c300000?
>>> >
>>>
>>> Its an AOSS message RAM and all other SM* SoCs have as qmp@
>>> and the dt binding as well, I see only SM8150 with power-controller,
>>> that should probably be fixed?
>>
>> Node name should be generic while still being meaningful. Nobody knows
>> what qmp is, but power-controller makes sense. Can you fix this and
>> the
>> others to be power-controller?
>>
we probably would be changing them back
to qmp or something more generic soon
since the consensus was qmp wasn't a
power-controller. So not sure if its
worth the effort here.
>
> Ok makes sense, I will post changing others as well and see if we get
> any comments there.
>
> Thanks,
> Sai
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 9:30 [PATCH 0/9] qcom/sc7280: Enable various hardware blocks on SC7280 SoC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add LLCC for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-06 20:47 ` Rob Herring
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/9] soc: qcom: llcc: Add configuration data " Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-26 8:04 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-26 18:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-27 13:58 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-03-01 4:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 4/9] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom-ipcc: Add compatible for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 14:13 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-25 19:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add IPCC for SC7280 SoC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 14:12 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-25 19:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: Add SC7280 compatible Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-06 20:53 ` Rob Herring
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 7/9] soc: qcom: aoss: Add AOSS QMP support for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add AOSS QMP node Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-26 7:51 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-26 18:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-27 13:56 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-03-09 5:58 ` Sibi Sankar [this message]
2021-03-23 3:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-24 7:05 ` Sibi Sankar
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add Coresight support Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-03-11 23:14 ` [PATCH 0/9] qcom/sc7280: Enable various hardware blocks on SC7280 SoC Bjorn Andersson
2021-03-14 19:05 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d19fbcc91b4ef045014b225e7fdf9780@codeaurora.org \
--to=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).