Re: [PATCH 2/4] coresight: Add support for multiple output ports on the funnel

[Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>]

On 18/04/2024 13:01, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
> Hi Mike and Suzuki
> 
> On 4/18/2024 5:25 PM, Mike Leach wrote:
>> Hi Suzuki
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 10:00 AM
>>> To: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>; Mathieu Poirier
>>> <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>; Alexander Shishkin
>>> <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>; Konrad Dybcio
>>> <konradybcio@gmail.com>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; Krzysztof
>>> Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Jinlong Mao
>>> <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; coresight@lists.linaro.org; linux-arm-
>>> kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>>> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com>;
>>> Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com>; Trilok Soni
>>> <quic_tsoni@quicinc.com>; Song Chai <quic_songchai@quicinc.com>; 
>>> linux-arm-
>>> msm@vger.kernel.org; andersson@kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] coresight: Add support for multiple output 
>>> ports on the
>>> funnel
>>>
>>> Hi Mike
>>>
>>> On 18/04/2024 09:48, Mike Leach wrote:
>>>> Hi Suzuki
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 10:21, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> On 16/04/2024 15:19, Mike Leach wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 14:24, Suzuki K Poulose 
>>>>>> <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/04/2024 14:22, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/9/2024 3:13 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 29/03/2024 09:27, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/22/2024 12:41 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/03/2024 08:32, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Funnel devices are now capable of supporting multiple-inputs
>>>>>>>>>>>> and multiple-outputs configuration with in built hardware
>>>>>>>>>>>> filtering for TPDM devices. Add software support to this
>>>>>>>>>>>> function. Output port is selected according to the source in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the trace
>>> path.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The source of the input port on funnels will be marked in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> device tree.
>>>>>>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>> tpdm@xxxxxxx {
>>>>>>>>>>>>         ... ... ... ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> funnel_XXX: funnel@xxxxxxx {
>>>>>>>>>>>>         ... ... ... ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>         out-ports {
>>>>>>>>>>>>             ... ... ... ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>             port@x {
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 ... ... ... ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 label = "xxxxxxx.tpdm"; <-- To label the source
>>>>>>>>>>>>             };                           corresponding to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the output
>>>>>>>>>>>>         ... ... ... ...                  connection 
>>>>>>>>>>>> "port@x". And this
>>>>>>>>>>>>         };                               is a hardware static
>>>>>>>>>>>> connections.
>>>>>>>>>>>>         ... ... ... ...                  Here needs to refer 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to hardware
>>>>>>>>>>>> };                                   design.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then driver will parse the source label marked in the device
>>>>>>>>>>>> tree, and save it to the coresight path. When the function
>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to know the source label, it could obtain it from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight path
>>> parameter.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the output port knows which source it corresponds to, and it
>>>>>>>>>>>> also knows which input port it corresponds to.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why do we need labels ? We have connection information for all
>>>>>>>>>>> devices (both in and out), so, why do we need this label to 
>>>>>>>>>>> find a device
>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because our funnel's design has multi-output ports, the data
>>>>>>>>>> stream will not
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> know which output port should pass in building the data trace 
>>>>>>>>>> path.
>>>>>>>>>> This source
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> label can make the data stream find the right output port to go.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And also, I thought TPDM is a source device, why does a funnel
>>>>>>>>>>> output port link to a source ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, this label doesn't mean this funnel output port link to a
>>>>>>>>>> source, it just let
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the output port know its data source.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are these funnels programmable ? Or, are they static ? If they
>>>>>>>>>>> are static, do these need to be described in the DT ? If they
>>>>>>>>>>> are simply acting as a "LINK" (or HWFIFO ?)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> These funnels are static, and we will add the "label" to the DT
>>>>>>>>>> to describe the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> multi-output ports for these funnels.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think there is still a bit of confusion. By "Dynamic" I mean,
>>>>>>>>> the "dynamic funnel" (explicit port enablement via MMIO) vs
>>>>>>>>> "static funnel" (no programming, always ON).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, coming to your example, do we need to "explicitly" enable
>>>>>>>>> trace flow for an "input" and/or an "output" port in your 
>>>>>>>>> "funnel" ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry for my misunderstanding in the previous mails. Our funnels
>>>>>>>> are programmable just like the common dynamic funnels.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In our solution, we just make funnels have multiple output ports
>>>>>>>> connected to different devices or ports. When we use it, we still
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> enable the input port through programming. Our solution is to know
>>>>>>>> which input port the expected data comes from based on the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> source label corresponding to the output port. This way we can
>>>>>>>> build the expected trace path. In other respects, it is used the
>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> as common dynamic funnels.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok. So, to summarise :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. This is not a standard Funnel, but a trace link with 
>>>>>>> multiple-input
>>>>>>>        and multiple-output, with inputs hardwired to an outline at
>>>>>>>        integration.
>>>>>>> 2. The programming model is same as that of a "standard funnel".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, we do have enough information in the coresight_connections to
>>>>>>> traverse input/output ports. But we need additional logic to
>>>>>>> "hardwire" the ports to each other and necessary logic to handle
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are two options here :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Treat this as a new component and have its own driver, with
>>>>>>>        additional logic to handle the input/output wiring.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. Drive it using the funnel driver, with a a new compatible and
>>>>>>>        add additional logic to handle the input/output wiring.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My inclination is towards (2), we need to see how this works out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We need to irrespective of the options, we need special handling
>>>>>>> for hardwired ports in 1) building path 2) walking back the path
>>>>>>> (in TPDA driver)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We also need some "DT" information to bind a given input port to an
>>>>>>> output port. We must not use "any device" labels to hack this up,
>>>>>>> like the approach in this series.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that the internal connections are static for the given device,
>>>>>> then the compatible will imply these connections in just the same
>>>>>> way as the arm,coresight-funnel implies that all inputs are
>>>>>> connected to the single output.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sorry, I couldn't follow the last part. We have two or more
>>>>> output ports and we need a way to identify, which input port is
>>>>> hardwired to
>>>>> output-port0 and output-port1. Given we need special handling for
>>>>> these anyway, I would like to avoid hard coding the input-output 
>>>>> connection.
>>>>> i.e., we do not want to assume that input-0  is always => output-0.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If we regard the current component as having compatible
>>>> "qcom,coresight-compound-funnel-v1", then this identifies the
>>>> relationship between the in-ports and out-ports.
>>>> So the new driver / extension to the funnel driver that handles this
>>>> compatible with know the static mapping between input and output so
>>>> program it.
>>>
>>> Ok, but like I said, having one compatible may not be enough to know 
>>> the "static"
>>> mapping for all possible device instances on different SoCs.
>>>
>>
>> The compatible name would have to change if the mapping changed.
>> Using the compatible is simpler, but less flexible
>>
>>>>
>>>> If however you want a more generic approach to handle future different
>>>> versions of the component, then of course a method in DT of mapping
>>>> in-ports to out-ports is useful.
>>>>
>>>> If did wonder if something along the lines of:-
>>>>
>>>> compound-funnel@0x1234000 {
>>>>        compatible = "compound-funnel"
>>>>        regs = < 0x1234000 0x1000>
>>>>         sub-funnel@0 {
>>>>                    in-ports {
>>>>                           [some port definitions]
>>>>                     }
>>>>                    out-ports {
>>>>                          [some port definitions]
>>>>                     }
>>>>          }
>>>>         sub-funnel@1 {
>>>>                    in-ports {
>>>>                           [some port definitions]
>>>>                     }
>>>>                    out-ports {
>>>>                          [some port definitions]
>>>>                    }
>>>>           }
>>>> }
>>>
>>> That would work, with "two" different coresight devices for each 
>>> "embedded
>>> funnel". And that also confuses the user with the topology.
>>
>> I wasn't suggesting two different coresight devices, but finding a way 
>> to iterate the sub-nodes to create a single device with the inputs 
>> mapped to outputs. Which may or may not be easily do-able.
>>
>> As to topology - no more confusing than a "funnel" with multiple 
>> outputs, or phandle links between inputs and outputs. It does visually 
>> represent what the device really is - multiple effective funnels 
>> controlled by a single set of registers.
>>
> 
> Let me provide the hardware topology here to facilitate the discussion.
> 
> |----------|     |---------|     |----------|   |---------|
> |  TPDM 0  |     | Source0 |     | Source 1 |   | TPDM 1  |
> |----------|     |---------|     |----------|   |---------|
>       |                |                |             |
>       |                |                |             |
>       |      --------- |                |             |
>       |      |                          |             |
>       |      |                          |             |
>       |      |                          |             |
>    \-------------/ ----------------------             |
>     \  Funnel 0 /  |                                  |
>      -----------   |  ---------------------------------
>           |        |  |
>           |        |  |
>         \ -------------/
>          \  Funnel 1  /
>           -----------/
>              |  |---------------------
>              |  |------------         |
>              |               |TPDM0   |TPDM1
>              |            \ ----------------/
>              |             \   TPDA 0      /
>              |              --------------/
>              |                    |
>              |                    |
>              |Source0/1           |
>           \-------------------------------/
>            \     Funnel 2                /
>              ---------------------------
> 
> To describe this topology in device tree, we need to indicate input 
> port0 of FUNNEL0 is static link to output port0 of FUNNEL0 which links 
> to input port0 of TPDA0. When code builds the path, it can get the 

This is making things even worse. Hold on there. Please could you
confirm the topology again via the "Funnel 1". You seemed to have
skipped it in the path description.


How many outputs does the Funnel 1 have ? 2 or 3 ? How does the Funnel 1
know to split the "data" from Funnel1:input0 (which could be either 
Source0 or TPDM0) ?


> static link information from topology and select correct path. As Suzuki 
> has suggested, we can describe the topology like below.

No, I suggested hardwiring the output-input of "the same component". Not
of the two different components. I guess we need to sort this out
offline, (happy to setup a call to understand and clear things better).


> 
> funnel0 {
>      ...
>      in-ports {
>          port@0 {
>              funnel0_in0: endpoint {
>                  remote-endpoint = <&tpdm0_output>;
>                  <hard-wired-to*>=
>                    <&funnel1_out0>;

No, I meant. Not skipping the components.

		<&funnel0_out0>;

This leaves the question of how Funnel1 does the separation, unless
it is a replicator and does the filtering based on the TraceID.


Suzuki


>              }
>          }
>      }
> }
> 
> funnel1 {
>      ...
>      out-ports {
>          port@0 {
>              funnel1_out0: endpoint {
>                  remote-endpoint= <&tpdm0_in0>;
>                  <hard-wired-to*>=
>                      <&funnel0_in0>;
>              }
>          }
>      }
> }
> 
> 
>> Mike
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> might be made to work? not sure about the implications of having more
>>>> that one set of in-ports and out-ports in a component in the device
>>>> tree & would need specific handling in the driver to iterate
>>>> sub-funnels.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Irrespective of if a new driver is used, or an extension to the
>>>>>> current funnel driver to handle a new compatible - the mapping
>>>>>> between input and output ports are created based on the compatible..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As we are building a path from source to sink, what is then needed
>>>>>> is a method in the generic path building code, to recognise these
>>>>>> amppings and filter the output ports that are searched based on the
>>>>>> input port in use.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed. We could mark this as a property of the
>>>>> port/coresight_connection.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On standard components, where the mapping is not present, then the
>>>>>> code will continue as it does now, for these compound funnels, the
>>>>>> mappings will be present and the output filtering will occur.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed
>>>>>
>>>>>> This removes the need for the labels / extra connection attributes
>>>>>> on devices other than the funnel, and also removes the need to
>>>>>> specify the internal connections as part of the device tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am still not clear how we map the input-output ports. Rest is what
>>>>> exactly I had in mind. So, once we sort out the port mapping we could
>>>>> proceed to the prototyping.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> given we iterate by output port index into an array of out ports, and
>>>> have an array of in-ports by index, a third mapping array, same size
>>>> as in-ports, determining the associated out port index should suffice.
>>>> Mapping array should be optional - if not there, path discovery works
>>>> as previously
>>>
>>> We could simply add a "(sticky)flag" to the
>>> "coresight_connection".src_port/dest_port and extend the array to 
>>> include the
>>> sticky_port for src/dest port and use that flag to force the path 
>>> traversal.
>>>
>>> Suzuki
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>> Suzuki
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rob/Krzysztof,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have any recommendations for describing the 'hard wired
>>>>>>> ports' ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> e.g:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> component {
>>>>>>>        input_ports {
>>>>>>>           component_input_port0: port@0 {
>>>>>>>               ...
>>>>>>>               <hard-wired-to*> = &component_output_port0;
>>>>>>>           };
>>>>>>>           ...
>>>>>>>       };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       output_ports {
>>>>>>>         componentne_output_port0: port@0 {
>>>>>>>             ...
>>>>>>>             <hard-wired-to> = &component_input_port0;
>>>>>>>         };
>>>>>>>         ...
>>>>>>>       };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Need a better suitable property than "hard-wired-to".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Suzuki
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tao
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "If they are simply acting as a "LINK" (or HWFIFO ?) " I'm not
>>>>>>>>>> sure what's the meaning
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i.e, Like TMC-ETF in HWFIFO mode. In this mode, the TMC-ETF is
>>>>>>>>> acting like a cache for easing ATB data load, by providing h/w 
>>>>>>>>> buffering.
>>>>>>>>> (In your case, it may not be providing any buffering, it doesn't
>>>>>>>>> matter either way, as it is not visible to the driver).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Suzuki
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> of this. Could you describe it in detail?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tao
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Suzuki
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>      drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c  | 81
>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>>>>>>>>      .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c  |  5 ++
>>>>>>>>>>>>      include/linux/coresight.h                     |  2 +
>>>>>>>>>>>>      3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> index 5dde597403b3..b1b5e6d9ec7a 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -113,15 +113,63 @@ struct coresight_device
>>>>>>>>>>>> *coresight_get_percpu_sink(int cpu)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>>>>>>>      EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_get_percpu_sink);
>>>>>>>>>>>>      +static struct coresight_device
>>>>>>>>>>>> *coresight_get_source(struct list_head *path)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct coresight_device *csdev;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (!path)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        return NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    csdev = list_first_entry(path, struct coresight_node,
>>>>>>>>>>>> link)->csdev;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (csdev->type != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        return NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    return csdev;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>>>>>> + * coresight_source_filter - checks whether the connection
>>>>>>>>>>>> +matches
>>>>>>>>>>>> the source
>>>>>>>>>>>> + * of path if connection is binded to specific source.
>>>>>>>>>>>> + * @path:    The list of devices
>>>>>>>>>>>> + * @conn:    The connection of one outport
>>>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>>>> + * Return zero if the connection doesn't have a source binded
>>>>>>>>>>>> + or
>>>>>>>>>>>> source of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> + * path matches the source binds to connection.
>>>>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>>>>> +static int coresight_source_filter(struct list_head *path,
>>>>>>>>>>>> +            struct coresight_connection *conn) {
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    int ret = 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct coresight_device *source = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (conn->source_label == NULL)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        return ret;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    source = coresight_get_source(path);
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (source == NULL)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        return ret;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (strstr(kobject_get_path(&source->dev.kobj, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> GFP_KERNEL),
>>>>>>>>>>>> +            conn->source_label))
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        ret = 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    else
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        ret = -1;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    return ret;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>      static struct coresight_connection *
>>>>>>>>>>>>      coresight_find_out_connection(struct coresight_device 
>>>>>>>>>>>> *src_dev,
>>>>>>>>>>>> -                  struct coresight_device *dest_dev)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                  struct coresight_device *dest_dev,
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                  struct list_head *path)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      {
>>>>>>>>>>>>          int i;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          struct coresight_connection *conn;
>>>>>>>>>>>>            for (i = 0; i < src_dev->pdata->nr_outconns; i++) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>              conn = src_dev->pdata->out_conns[i];
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        if (coresight_source_filter(path, conn))
>>>>>>>>>>>> +            continue;
>>>>>>>>>>>>              if (conn->dest_dev == dest_dev)
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  return conn;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          }
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -312,7 +360,8 @@ static void coresight_disable_sink(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev)
>>>>>>>>>>>>        static int coresight_enable_link(struct 
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       struct coresight_device *parent,
>>>>>>>>>>>> -                 struct coresight_device *child)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                 struct coresight_device *child,
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                 struct list_head *path)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      {
>>>>>>>>>>>>          int ret = 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          int link_subtype;
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -321,8 +370,8 @@ static int coresight_enable_link(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>          if (!parent || !child)
>>>>>>>>>>>>              return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>>>>>>      -    inconn = coresight_find_out_connection(parent, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> csdev);
>>>>>>>>>>>> -    outconn = coresight_find_out_connection(csdev, child);
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    inconn = coresight_find_out_connection(parent, csdev, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> path);
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    outconn = coresight_find_out_connection(csdev, child,
>>>>>>>>>>>> + path);
>>>>>>>>>>>>          link_subtype = csdev->subtype.link_subtype;
>>>>>>>>>>>>            if (link_subtype == CORESIGHT_DEV_SUBTYPE_LINK_MERG
>>>>>>>>>>>> &&
>>>>>>>>>>>> IS_ERR(inconn))
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -341,7 +390,8 @@ static int coresight_enable_link(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>        static void coresight_disable_link(struct 
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         struct coresight_device *parent,
>>>>>>>>>>>> -                   struct coresight_device *child)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                   struct coresight_device *child,
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                   struct list_head *path)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      {
>>>>>>>>>>>>          int i;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          int link_subtype;
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -350,8 +400,8 @@ static void coresight_disable_link(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>          if (!parent || !child)
>>>>>>>>>>>>              return;
>>>>>>>>>>>>      -    inconn = coresight_find_out_connection(parent, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> csdev);
>>>>>>>>>>>> -    outconn = coresight_find_out_connection(csdev, child);
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    inconn = coresight_find_out_connection(parent, csdev, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> path);
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    outconn = coresight_find_out_connection(csdev, child,
>>>>>>>>>>>> + path);
>>>>>>>>>>>>          link_subtype = csdev->subtype.link_subtype;
>>>>>>>>>>>>            if (link_ops(csdev)->disable) { @@ -507,7 +557,7 @@
>>>>>>>>>>>> static void coresight_disable_path_from(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> list_head *path,
>>>>>>>>>>>>              case CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINK:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  parent = list_prev_entry(nd, link)->csdev;
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  child = list_next_entry(nd, link)->csdev;
>>>>>>>>>>>> -            coresight_disable_link(csdev, parent, child);
>>>>>>>>>>>> +            coresight_disable_link(csdev, parent, child,
>>>>>>>>>>>> + path);
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  break;
>>>>>>>>>>>>              default:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  break;
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -588,7 +638,7 @@ int coresight_enable_path(struct list_head
>>>>>>>>>>>> *path, enum cs_mode mode,
>>>>>>>>>>>>              case CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINK:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  parent = list_prev_entry(nd, link)->csdev;
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  child = list_next_entry(nd, link)->csdev;
>>>>>>>>>>>> -            ret = coresight_enable_link(csdev, parent, child);
>>>>>>>>>>>> +            ret = coresight_enable_link(csdev, parent, child,
>>>>>>>>>>>> + path);
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  if (ret)
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      goto err;
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  break;
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -802,7 +852,8 @@ static void coresight_drop_device(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       */
>>>>>>>>>>>>      static int _coresight_build_path(struct 
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       struct coresight_device *sink,
>>>>>>>>>>>> -                 struct list_head *path)
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                 struct list_head *path,
>>>>>>>>>>>> +                 struct coresight_device *source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      {
>>>>>>>>>>>>          int i, ret;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          bool found = false;
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -814,7 +865,7 @@ static int _coresight_build_path(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>            if (coresight_is_percpu_source(csdev) &&
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_is_percpu_sink(sink) &&
>>>>>>>>>>>>              sink == per_cpu(csdev_sink,
>>>>>>>>>>>> source_ops(csdev)->cpu_id(csdev))) {
>>>>>>>>>>>> -        if (_coresight_build_path(sink, sink, path) == 0) {
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        if (_coresight_build_path(sink, sink, path, source)
>>>>>>>>>>>> + == 0) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  found = true;
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  goto out;
>>>>>>>>>>>>              }
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -825,8 +876,12 @@ static int _coresight_build_path(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>              struct coresight_device *child_dev;
>>>>>>>>>>>>                child_dev =
>>>>>>>>>>>> csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]->dest_dev;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        if (csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]->source_label &&
>>>>>>>>>>>> + !strstr(kobject_get_path(&source->dev.kobj, GFP_KERNEL),
>>>>>>>>>>>> + csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]->source_label))
>>>>>>>>>>>> +            continue;
>>>>>>>>>>>>              if (child_dev &&
>>>>>>>>>>>> -            _coresight_build_path(child_dev, sink, path) == 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0) {
>>>>>>>>>>>> +            _coresight_build_path(child_dev, sink, path,
>>>>>>>>>>>> + source)
>>>>>>>>>>>> == 0) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  found = true;
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  break;
>>>>>>>>>>>>              }
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -871,7 +926,7 @@ struct list_head
>>>>>>>>>>>> *coresight_build_path(struct coresight_device *source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>            INIT_LIST_HEAD(path);
>>>>>>>>>>>>      -    rc = _coresight_build_path(source, sink, path);
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    rc = _coresight_build_path(source, sink, path, source);
>>>>>>>>>>>>          if (rc) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>              kfree(path);
>>>>>>>>>>>>              return ERR_PTR(rc); diff --git
>>>>>>>>>>>> a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> index 9d550f5697fa..f553fb20966d 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ static int
>>>>>>>>>>>> of_coresight_parse_endpoint(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> device *dev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>          struct fwnode_handle *rdev_fwnode;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          struct coresight_connection conn = {};
>>>>>>>>>>>>          struct coresight_connection *new_conn;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    const char *label;
>>>>>>>>>>>>            do {
>>>>>>>>>>>>              /* Parse the local port details */ @@ -243,6
>>>>>>>>>>>> +244,10 @@ static int of_coresight_parse_endpoint(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> device *dev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>              conn.dest_fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(rdev_fwnode);
>>>>>>>>>>>>              conn.dest_port = rendpoint.port;
>>>>>>>>>>>>      +        conn.source_label = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +        if (!of_property_read_string(ep, "label", &label))
>>>>>>>>>>>> +            conn.source_label = label;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>              new_conn = coresight_add_out_conn(dev, pdata, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> &conn);
>>>>>>>>>>>>              if (IS_ERR_VALUE(new_conn)) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  fwnode_handle_put(conn.dest_fwnode);
>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h
>>>>>>>>>>>> b/include/linux/coresight.h index e8b6e388218c..a9c06ef9bbb2
>>>>>>>>>>>> 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/coresight.h
>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h
>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct coresight_desc {
>>>>>>>>>>>>       * struct coresight_connection - representation of a
>>>>>>>>>>>> single connection
>>>>>>>>>>>>       * @src_port:    a connection's output port number.
>>>>>>>>>>>>       * @dest_port:    destination's input port number 
>>>>>>>>>>>> @src_port is
>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to.
>>>>>>>>>>>> + * @source_label: source component's label.
>>>>>>>>>>>>       * @dest_fwnode: destination component's fwnode handle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>       * @dest_dev:    a @coresight_device representation of the
>>> component
>>>>>>>>>>>>              connected to @src_port. NULL until the device is
>>>>>>>>>>>> created @@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ struct coresight_desc {
>>>>>>>>>>>>      struct coresight_connection {
>>>>>>>>>>>>          int src_port;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          int dest_port;
>>>>>>>>>>>> +    const char *source_label;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          struct fwnode_handle *dest_fwnode;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          struct coresight_device *dest_dev;
>>>>>>>>>>>>          struct coresight_sysfs_link *link;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CoreSight mailing list -- coresight@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe 
>>> send an email to
>>> coresight-leave@lists.linaro.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> CoreSight mailing list -- coresight@lists.linaro.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to coresight-leave@lists.linaro.org
>