linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] KVM: x86: tell guests if the exposed SMT topology is trustworthy
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 00:56:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de3cade3-c069-dc6b-1d2d-aa10abe365b8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105161737.21395-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>

On 05/11/19 17:17, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> There is also one additional piece of the information missing. A VM can be
> sharing physical cores with other VMs (or other userspace tasks on the
> host) so does KVM_FEATURE_TRUSTWORTHY_SMT imply that it's not the case or
> not? It is unclear if this changes anything and can probably be left out
> of scope (just don't do that).
> 
> Similar to the already existent 'NoNonArchitecturalCoreSharing' Hyper-V
> enlightenment, the default value of KVM_HINTS_TRUSTWORTHY_SMT is set to
> !cpu_smt_possible(). KVM userspace is thus supposed to pass it to guest's
> CPUIDs in case it is '1' (meaning no SMT on the host at all) or do some
> extra work (like CPU pinning and exposing the correct topology) before
> passing '1' to the guest.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst     | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c                 |  7 ++++++-
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst
> index 01b081f6e7ea..64b94103fc90 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst
> @@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ KVM_FEATURE_PV_SCHED_YIELD        13          guest checks this feature bit
>                                                before using paravirtualized
>                                                sched yield.
>  
> +KVM_FEATURE_TRUSTWORTHY_SMT       14          set when host supports 'SMT
> +                                              topology is trustworthy' hint
> +                                              (KVM_HINTS_TRUSTWORTHY_SMT).
> +

Instead of defining a one-off bit, can we make:

ecx = the set of known "hints" (defaults to edx if zero)

edx = the set of hints that apply to the virtual machine

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05 16:17 [PATCH RFC] KVM: x86: tell guests if the exposed SMT topology is trustworthy Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-11-05 17:17 ` Liran Alon
2019-11-05 17:30   ` Liran Alon
2019-11-05 17:35     ` Jim Mattson
2019-11-05 19:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-05 23:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-07 10:38     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
     [not found]     ` <943488A8-2DD7-4471-B3C7-9F21A0B0BCF9@dinechin.org>
2019-11-07 15:02       ` Liran Alon
2019-11-08 15:35         ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-11-08 15:52           ` Liran Alon
2019-11-05 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-05 23:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-06  8:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-20 10:13       ` Wanpeng Li
2019-11-05 23:51   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-06  8:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06  9:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-05 23:56 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-12-06  4:01   ` Ankur Arora
2019-12-06 13:46     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-12-06 20:31       ` Ankur Arora
2019-12-09  9:15         ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de3cade3-c069-dc6b-1d2d-aa10abe365b8@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).