From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:TARGET SUBSYSTEM" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>, Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] driver core: Add ability to delete device links of unregistered devices
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 16:18:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f538dda5-6c55-0930-b258-85a3245f06a8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hZCUruTc9U64Kx0EO8iky34AR+=QeNcSafQEvcGWapLw@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/07/21 2:28 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 8:43 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Managed device links are deleted by device_del(). However it is possible to
>> add a device link to a consumer before device_add(), and then discover an
>> error prevents the device from being used. In that case normally references
>> to the device would be dropped and the device would be deleted. However the
>> device link holds a reference to the device, so the device link and device
>> remain indefinitely.
>>
>> Amend device link removal to accept removal of a link with an
>> unregistered consumer device.
>>
>> To make that work nicely, the devlink_remove_symlinks() function must be
>> amended to cope with the absence of the consumer's sysfs presence,
>> otherwise sysfs_remove_link() will generate a warning.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Fixes: b294ff3e34490 ("scsi: ufs: core: Enable power management for wlun")
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/core.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
>> index ea5b85354526..24bacdb315c6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
>> @@ -562,7 +562,8 @@ static void devlink_remove_symlinks(struct device *dev,
>> struct device *con = link->consumer;
>> char *buf;
>>
>> - sysfs_remove_link(&link->link_dev.kobj, "consumer");
>> + if (device_is_registered(con))
>> + sysfs_remove_link(&link->link_dev.kobj, "consumer");
>
> I think that this is needed regardless of the changes in
> device_link_put_kref(), because if somebody decides to delete a
> stateless device link before registering the consumer device,
> sysfs_remove_link() will still complain, won't it?
I would think so.
>
>> sysfs_remove_link(&link->link_dev.kobj, "supplier");
>>
>> len = max(strlen(dev_bus_name(sup)) + strlen(dev_name(sup)),
>> @@ -575,8 +576,10 @@ static void devlink_remove_symlinks(struct device *dev,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - snprintf(buf, len, "supplier:%s:%s", dev_bus_name(sup), dev_name(sup));
>> - sysfs_remove_link(&con->kobj, buf);
>> + if (device_is_registered(con)) {
>> + snprintf(buf, len, "supplier:%s:%s", dev_bus_name(sup), dev_name(sup));
>> + sysfs_remove_link(&con->kobj, buf);
>> + }
>
> And here too, if I'm not mistaken.
>
> So in that case it would be better to put the above changes into a
> separate patch and add a Fixes tag to it.
Yes, that makes sense. I'll send a V3
>
>> snprintf(buf, len, "consumer:%s:%s", dev_bus_name(con), dev_name(con));
>> sysfs_remove_link(&sup->kobj, buf);
>> kfree(buf);
>> @@ -885,6 +888,8 @@ static void device_link_put_kref(struct device_link *link)
>> {
>> if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS)
>> kref_put(&link->kref, __device_link_del);
>> + else if (!device_is_registered(link->consumer))
>> + __device_link_del(&link->kref);
>> else
>> WARN(1, "Unable to drop a managed device link reference\n");
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-09 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 6:43 [PATCH V2 0/2] driver core: Add ability to delete device links of unregistered devices Adrian Hunter
2021-07-09 6:43 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] " Adrian Hunter
2021-07-09 9:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-09 11:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-09 11:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-09 13:18 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2021-07-09 6:43 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] scsi: ufshcd: Fix device links when BOOT WLUN fails to probe Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f538dda5-6c55-0930-b258-85a3245f06a8@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).