linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>,
	Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:59:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdd74d83-acd4-23da-6c0c-b52573d999bb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7F6B5F6A-EC76-4A9F-8EB6-AEAB9994D91A@arista.com>

Hi,

It's hard for me to understand why do we remove the rmrr related
code in this patch.

And, now we have two places to hold a domain for a device: group and
dev->info. We can consider to optimize the use of per device iommu
arch data. This should be later work anyway.

More comments inline.

On 3/4/19 11:47 PM, James Sewart wrote:
> The generic IOMMU code will allocate and attach a dma ops domain to each
> device that comes online, replacing any lazy allocated domain. Removes
> RMRR application at iommu init time as we won't have a domain attached
> to any device. iommu.c will do this after attaching a device using
> create_direct_mappings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 202 ++----------------------------------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 194 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index 71cd6bbfec05..282257e2628d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -2595,118 +2595,6 @@ static struct dmar_domain *dmar_insert_one_dev_info(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>   	return domain;
>   }
>   
> -static int get_last_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *opaque)
> -{
> -	*(u16 *)opaque = alias;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct dmar_domain *find_or_alloc_domain(struct device *dev, int gaw)
> -{
> -	struct device_domain_info *info = NULL;
> -	struct dmar_domain *domain = NULL;
> -	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> -	u16 dma_alias;
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	u8 bus, devfn;
> -
> -	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, &bus, &devfn);
> -	if (!iommu)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> -		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> -
> -		pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, get_last_alias, &dma_alias);
> -
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> -		info = dmar_search_domain_by_dev_info(pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus),
> -						      PCI_BUS_NUM(dma_alias),
> -						      dma_alias & 0xff);
> -		if (info) {
> -			iommu = info->iommu;
> -			domain = info->domain;
> -		}
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> -
> -		/* DMA alias already has a domain, use it */
> -		if (info)
> -			goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Allocate and initialize new domain for the device */
> -	domain = alloc_domain(0);
> -	if (!domain)
> -		return NULL;
> -	if (domain_init(domain, iommu, gaw)) {
> -		domain_exit(domain);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
> -out:
> -
> -	return domain;
> -}
> -
> -static struct dmar_domain *set_domain_for_dev(struct device *dev,
> -					      struct dmar_domain *domain)
> -{
> -	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> -	struct dmar_domain *tmp;
> -	u16 req_id, dma_alias;
> -	u8 bus, devfn;
> -
> -	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, &bus, &devfn);
> -	if (!iommu)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	req_id = ((u16)bus << 8) | devfn;
> -
> -	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> -		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> -
> -		pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, get_last_alias, &dma_alias);
> -
> -		/* register PCI DMA alias device */
> -		if (req_id != dma_alias) {
> -			tmp = dmar_insert_one_dev_info(iommu, PCI_BUS_NUM(dma_alias),
> -					dma_alias & 0xff, NULL, domain);
> -
> -			if (!tmp || tmp != domain)
> -				return tmp;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	tmp = dmar_insert_one_dev_info(iommu, bus, devfn, dev, domain);
> -	if (!tmp || tmp != domain)
> -		return tmp;
> -
> -	return domain;
> -}
> -
> -static struct dmar_domain *get_domain_for_dev(struct device *dev, int gaw)
> -{
> -	struct dmar_domain *domain, *tmp;
> -
> -	domain = find_domain(dev);
> -	if (domain)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	domain = find_or_alloc_domain(dev, gaw);
> -	if (!domain)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	tmp = set_domain_for_dev(dev, domain);
> -	if (!tmp || domain != tmp) {
> -		domain_exit(domain);
> -		domain = tmp;
> -	}
> -
> -out:
> -
> -	return domain;
> -}
> -
>   static int iommu_domain_identity_map(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>   				     unsigned long long start,
>   				     unsigned long long end)
> @@ -2779,7 +2667,7 @@ static int iommu_prepare_identity_map(struct device *dev,
>   	struct dmar_domain *domain;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	domain = get_domain_for_dev(dev, DEFAULT_DOMAIN_ADDRESS_WIDTH);
> +	domain = find_domain(dev);
>   	if (!domain)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> @@ -3301,11 +3189,9 @@ static int copy_translation_tables(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>   static int __init init_dmars(void)
>   {
>   	struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> -	struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrr;
>   	bool copied_tables = false;
> -	struct device *dev;
>   	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> -	int i, ret;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * for each drhd
> @@ -3466,32 +3352,6 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
>   			goto free_iommu;
>   		}
>   	}
> -	/*
> -	 * For each rmrr
> -	 *   for each dev attached to rmrr
> -	 *   do
> -	 *     locate drhd for dev, alloc domain for dev
> -	 *     allocate free domain
> -	 *     allocate page table entries for rmrr
> -	 *     if context not allocated for bus
> -	 *           allocate and init context
> -	 *           set present in root table for this bus
> -	 *     init context with domain, translation etc
> -	 *    endfor
> -	 * endfor
> -	 */
> -	pr_info("Setting RMRR:\n");
> -	for_each_rmrr_units(rmrr) {
> -		/* some BIOS lists non-exist devices in DMAR table. */
> -		for_each_active_dev_scope(rmrr->devices, rmrr->devices_cnt,
> -					  i, dev) {
> -			ret = iommu_prepare_rmrr_dev(rmrr, dev);
> -			if (ret)
> -				pr_err("Mapping reserved region failed\n");
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	iommu_prepare_isa();

Why do you want to remove this segment of code?

>   
>   domains_done:
>   
> @@ -3580,53 +3440,6 @@ static unsigned long intel_alloc_iova(struct device *dev,
>   	return iova_pfn;
>   }
>   
> -struct dmar_domain *get_valid_domain_for_dev(struct device *dev)
> -{
> -	struct dmar_domain *domain, *tmp;
> -	struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrr;
> -	struct device *i_dev;
> -	int i, ret;
> -
> -	domain = find_domain(dev);
> -	if (domain)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	domain = find_or_alloc_domain(dev, DEFAULT_DOMAIN_ADDRESS_WIDTH);
> -	if (!domain)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	/* We have a new domain - setup possible RMRRs for the device */
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	for_each_rmrr_units(rmrr) {
> -		for_each_active_dev_scope(rmrr->devices, rmrr->devices_cnt,
> -					  i, i_dev) {
> -			if (i_dev != dev)
> -				continue;
> -
> -			ret = domain_prepare_identity_map(dev, domain,
> -							  rmrr->base_address,
> -							  rmrr->end_address);
> -			if (ret)
> -				dev_err(dev, "Mapping reserved region failed\n");

We can't simply remove this segment of code, right? At least it should
be moved to the domain allocation interface.

> -		}
> -	}
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> -	tmp = set_domain_for_dev(dev, domain);
> -	if (!tmp || domain != tmp) {
> -		domain_exit(domain);
> -		domain = tmp;
> -	}
> -
> -out:
> -
> -	if (!domain)
> -		pr_err("Allocating domain for %s failed\n", dev_name(dev));
> -
> -
> -	return domain;
> -}
> -
>   /* Check if the dev needs to go through non-identity map and unmap process.*/
>   static int iommu_no_mapping(struct device *dev)
>   {
> @@ -3689,7 +3502,7 @@ static dma_addr_t __intel_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>   	if (iommu_no_mapping(dev))
>   		return paddr;
>   
> -	domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(dev);
> +	domain = find_domain(dev);
>   	if (!domain)
>   		return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
>   
> @@ -3753,7 +3566,8 @@ static void intel_unmap(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr, size_t size)
>   		return;
>   
>   	domain = find_domain(dev);
> -	BUG_ON(!domain);
> +	if (!domain)
> +		return;
>   

This is not related to this patch. Let's do it in a separated patch.

>   	iommu = domain_get_iommu(domain);
>   
> @@ -3899,7 +3713,7 @@ static int intel_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist, int nele
>   	if (iommu_no_mapping(dev))
>   		return intel_nontranslate_map_sg(dev, sglist, nelems, dir);
>   
> -	domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(dev);
> +	domain = find_domain(dev);
>   	if (!domain)
>   		return 0;
>   
> @@ -5377,9 +5191,9 @@ int intel_iommu_enable_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct intel_svm_dev *sd
>   	u64 ctx_lo;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(sdev->dev);
> +	domain = find_domain(sdev->dev);
>   	if (!domain)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return -ENOMEM;

This is not related to this patch. Let's do it in a separated patch.

>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
>   	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
> 

Best regards,
Lu Baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-05  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-04 15:41 [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings to after device_attach James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Implement apply_resv_region for reserving IOVA ranges James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:46   ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA and IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY to be allocated James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:47     ` [PATCH 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains James Sewart
2019-03-05  6:59       ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2019-03-05 11:46         ` James Sewart
2019-03-06  7:00           ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-06 18:08             ` James Sewart
2019-03-07  6:31               ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-07 10:21                 ` James Sewart
2019-03-08  1:09                   ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-08  3:09                   ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-08 16:57                     ` James Sewart
2019-03-09  1:53                       ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-09 11:49                         ` James Sewart
2019-03-10  2:51                           ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-05  6:46     ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA and IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY to be allocated Lu Baolu
2019-03-05 11:34       ` James Sewart
2019-03-08  1:20     ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-03-09 11:57       ` James Sewart
2019-03-05  6:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain Lu Baolu
2019-03-05 11:14   ` James Sewart
2019-03-06  6:27     ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:57   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings to after device_attach James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:58   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Implement apply_resv_region for reserving IOVA ranges James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:58   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Expose ISA direct mapping region via iommu_get_resv_regions James Sewart
2019-03-15  2:19     ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-22  9:57       ` James Sewart
2019-03-25  2:03         ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-25 12:57           ` James Sewart
2019-03-26  1:10             ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-26  1:24             ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-28 18:37               ` James Sewart
2019-03-29 15:26                 ` James Sewart
2019-04-04  6:49                   ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-05 18:02                     ` James Sewart
2019-04-08  2:43                       ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-10  5:22                       ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-15 14:16                         ` James Sewart
2019-04-16  2:18                           ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-24 23:47                             ` Tom Murphy
2019-04-25  1:15                               ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:58   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Ignore domain parameter in attach_device if device requires identity map James Sewart
2019-03-15  2:30     ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:58   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Enable DMA remapping after rmrr mapped James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:59   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA to be allocated by iommu_ops James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:59   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains James Sewart
2019-03-14 23:35     ` Jacob Pan
2019-03-22 10:07       ` James Sewart
2019-03-15  3:13   ` [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain Lu Baolu
2019-03-19 13:35     ` James Sewart
2019-03-20  1:26       ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-22 10:05         ` James Sewart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fdd74d83-acd4-23da-6c0c-b52573d999bb@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jamessewart@arista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmurphy@arista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).