From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 13:37:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff86540b-c362-ad06-225f-29daab1defdf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5127d46f-2d43-41e8-dde0-5ee42a9d47bb@gmail.com>
Jacek
On 09/11/2018 01:27 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On 09/10/2018 09:51 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Jacek
>>
>> On 09/10/2018 02:07 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> Dan, Pavel,
>>>
>>> On 09/10/2018 04:37 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>> Jacek
>>>>
>>>> On 09/08/2018 02:53 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>> Dan,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/07/2018 03:52 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I think Jacek pointed out that the bindings references in this bindings
>>>>>>>> don't even exist.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am thinking we need to deprecate this MFD driver and consolidate these drivers
>>>>>>>> in the LED directory as we indicated before. I did not find any ti-lmu support
>>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ti-lmu common core code and then the LED children appending the feature differentiation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Need some maintainer weigh in here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hehe. I'm maintnainer. Fun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know. I want to see if there was any other opinion. Especially for the LED driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a question - is this lm3697 LED controller a cell of some MFD
>>>>> device? Or is it a self-contained chip?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a self contained chip. And the LM3697 only function is a LED driver.
>>>> It does not have any other special functions like the LM363X drivers for GPIO and Regulator support.
>>>
>>> This is an argument for merging it as a standalone LED class driver
>>> then. It is even more justifiable, taking into account uncertainties
>>> related to the proper way of adding the support for it to the existing
>>> MFD driver, whereas the code reuse would be the only advantage of having
>>> thus support in MFD subsystem.
>>>
>>
>> Does the argument carry over to the other devices?
>
> If we want to be consequent - yes.
>
>> Like the LM3632 (part of the ti-lmu) has flash and torch and no other special functions
>> so it would look like the lm3601x family with different register mappings.
>
> Yes, this is obvious candidate for LED class flash driver.
>
>> The LM3631 seems to also be just a LED driver with no extra functionality
>>
>> I could go buy an EVM and put together a driver for that device as well using the lm3601x as
>> reference.
>
> I'm not going to encourage you to make this expense, but to put it
> politically - I'd happily welcome those drivers in the LED subsystem ;-)
>
Understood. I am waiting on hardware to test.
Dan
--
------------------
Dan Murphy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-06 13:50 [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver Dan Murphy
2018-09-06 13:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] leds: lm3697: Introduce the " Dan Murphy
2018-09-06 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for " Pavel Machek
2018-09-07 13:20 ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-07 13:32 ` Pavel Machek
2018-09-07 13:52 ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-08 19:53 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-09-10 14:37 ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-10 19:07 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-09-10 19:51 ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-11 18:27 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-09-11 18:37 ` Dan Murphy [this message]
2018-09-11 20:55 ` Pavel Machek
2018-09-11 21:05 ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-10 15:41 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff86540b-c362-ad06-225f-29daab1defdf@ti.com \
--to=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).