From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261350AbSI0Uc1>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:32:27 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261408AbSI0Uc1>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:32:27 -0400
Received: from gherkin.frus.com ([192.158.254.49]:60290 "HELO gherkin.frus.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S261350AbSI0Uc0>;
	Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:32:26 -0400
Message-Id: <m17v1rZ-0005khC@gherkin.frus.com>
From: rct@gherkin.frus.com (Bob_Tracy)
Subject: Re: 2.5.38: modular IDE broken
In-Reply-To: <1033056642.1269.64.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
 "from Alan Cox at Sep 26, 2002 05:10:42 pm"
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:37:25 -0500 (CDT)
CC: Kai Germaschewski <kai-germaschewski@uiowa.edu>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Alan Cox wrote:
> Let me give a simple clear explanation here. I don't give a flying ***k
> about modular IDE until the IDE works.

Understood.  My position is simply that I noted something broken, and
I reported it during the development cycle.  Would you prefer that I
had waited until after 2.5.X became 2.6?  I didn't think so...  I was
not (and am not) presuming to dictate what any developer's priorities
should be.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy                   WTO + WIPO = DMCA? http://www.anti-dmca.org
rct@frus.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------