From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
kaber@trash.net, pablo@netfilter.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hung task when calling clone() due to netfilter/slab
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:40:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1k44mt8e7.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201200848040.25882@router.home> (Christoph Lameter's message of "Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:49:57 -0600 (CST)")
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> writes:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> On the flip side removing from sysfs with locks held must be done
>> carefully, and as a default I would recommend not to hold locks over
>> removing things from sysfs. As removal blocks waiting for all of the
>> callers into sysfs those sysfs attributes to complete.
>>
>> It looks like you are ok on the removal because none of the sysfs
>> attributes appear to take the slub_lock, just /proc/slabinfo. But
>> it does look like playing with fire.
>
> Ok then I guess my last patch is needed to make sysfs operations safe.
>
> It may be good to audit the kernel for locks being held while calling
> sysfs functions. Isnt there a lockdep check that ensures that no locks are
> held?
I don't see a no locks are held check but call_usermodehelper in the
blocking case could certainly use one.
For the sysfs remove case lockdep should work.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-20 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-14 16:30 Hung task when calling clone() due to netfilter/slab Sasha Levin
2012-01-14 17:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-14 17:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-15 12:59 ` Sasha Levin
2012-01-15 17:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-17 15:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-17 15:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-17 15:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-17 15:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-17 16:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-17 22:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-19 21:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-19 22:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-20 2:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-20 2:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-20 14:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-20 20:40 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2012-02-01 8:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-02-01 17:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-01 8:07 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1k44mt8e7.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).