Re: Software suspend testing in 2.6.0-test1

[Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com>]

Hi!

Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:

> > > But why do you touch PF_FROZEN here? Refrigerator should do that.
> > > And wake_up_process should not be needed...
> > > If it is in refrigerator, it polls PF_FREEZE...
> > 
> > Note that the old code always called wake_up_process(), which is
> > necessary to make the process run one more iteration in refrigerator()
> > and relize that it is time to unfreeze.
> > 
> > The patch changes things so that wake_up_process() is NOT called if
> > the process is stopped at some other place than in refrigerator().
> > This ensures that processes that were stopped before we invoked swsusp
> > are still stopped after resume.
> 
> Yes, but you still print warning for them. I hopefully killed that.
...
> +static inline int interesting_process(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	if (p->flags & PF_IOTHREAD)
> +		return 0;
> +	if (p == current)
> +		return 0;
> +	if ((p->state == TASK_ZOMBIE) || (p->state == TASK_DEAD))
> +		return 0;
> +	if (p->state == TASK_STOPPED)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}

But this doesn't work. We can't skip stopped tasks in the
thaw_processes() function, because frozen tasks are also stopped
tasks. Therefore nothing will be woken up during resume.

It's probably best to just delete the printk("strange,...") line.

-- 
Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com
http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340